2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.86.064317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-dependent combinatorial level densities with the D1M Gogny force

Abstract: The combinatorial model of nuclear level densities has now reached a level of accuracy comparable to that of the best global analytical expressions without suffering from the limits imposed by the statistical hypothesis on which the latter expressions rely. In particular, it provides naturally, non-Gaussian spin distribution as well as nonequipartition of parities which are known to have a significant impact on cross section predictions at low energies. Our previous global model [S. Goriely, S. Hilaire, and A.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
200
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
200
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As the collective phenomena of these types correspond typically to the slow self-consistent motion of many particles, it is natural to expect that such coherent combinations of single-particle excitations partly compensate the deficit of levels at low energy due to the pairing gaps and give rise to the so-called collective enhancement of the level density [22,47] in comparison to the single-particle combinatorics of independent particles and holes. Modern refined approaches of this class account in various forms for the pairing phenomenon that changes the excitation spectrum, especially in even-even nuclei [23][24][25].…”
Section: Shell-model Predictions and Mean-field Combinatoricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the collective phenomena of these types correspond typically to the slow self-consistent motion of many particles, it is natural to expect that such coherent combinations of single-particle excitations partly compensate the deficit of levels at low energy due to the pairing gaps and give rise to the so-called collective enhancement of the level density [22,47] in comparison to the single-particle combinatorics of independent particles and holes. Modern refined approaches of this class account in various forms for the pairing phenomenon that changes the excitation spectrum, especially in even-even nuclei [23][24][25].…”
Section: Shell-model Predictions and Mean-field Combinatoricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influential review of earlier approaches of this type was given by Ericson [17], the later derivations can be found in [18][19][20][21], see also [22]. The recent achievements in this direction [23][24][25] include the pairing correlations considered as a part of the self-consistent mean field in the framework of the BCS theory or Hartree-FockBogoliubov variational ansatz. The shell-model MonteCarlo methods [26][27][28], being very demanding computationally, work relatively well at least with some parts of the full shell-model interaction but require the projection to the correct values of spin and parity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many applications of the finitetemperature formalism in nuclear structure, including early studies of fission barriers using the Thomas-Fermi approximation [15][16][17][18][19][20], the Hartree-Fock (FT-HF) approximation [21,22], and more recently at the HartreeFock-Bogoliubov (FT-HFB) approximation [23][24][25], or applications in the calculation of Giant Dipole Resonances and level densities [26][27][28][29]. Until now, however, there has been no systematic study of the validity and applicability of finite-temperature DFT in the description of induced fission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches like the Fermi gas model [28], the constant temperature model [29], the back-shifted Fermi gas model [30], and the generalized superfluid model [31,32] constitute the phenomenological expressions. For microscopic calculations, Hartree-Fock [33], Skyrme-Hartree-FockBogolyubov framework [34], and temperature-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov methods [35] are used. More details can be found in Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%