2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-010-4601-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-dependent barrier height in CdSe Schottky diode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation does an excellent job of fitting our experimental I – V curves for all five tn-ELJs and w CdSe values (Figure a). The fitting parameters required to produce these curves (Table ) are also physically reasonable, involving the known Richardson constant and barrier heights in the range from 0.52 to 0.64 eVclose to those reported for macroscopic CdSe–Au Schottky barriers . We conclude that for | E app | < 1.0 V, I – V curves for tn-ELJs are well described by the back-to-back Schottky barrier model. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation does an excellent job of fitting our experimental I – V curves for all five tn-ELJs and w CdSe values (Figure a). The fitting parameters required to produce these curves (Table ) are also physically reasonable, involving the known Richardson constant and barrier heights in the range from 0.52 to 0.64 eVclose to those reported for macroscopic CdSe–Au Schottky barriers . We conclude that for | E app | < 1.0 V, I – V curves for tn-ELJs are well described by the back-to-back Schottky barrier model. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The fitting parameters required to produce these curves ( Table 2.1) are also physically reasonable, involving the known Richardson constant and barrier heights in the range from 0.52 -0.64 eV -close to those reported for macroscopic CdSe-Au Schottky barriers. [58] We conclude that for |E app | < 1.0 V, I-V curves for tn-ELJs are well described by the back-to-back Schottky barrier model. [39,37,8] For |E app | > 1.0 V, however, the currents predicted by Eq.…”
Section: Process Flowmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…34,35 Forward bias [Au(−)] is associated both with higher current (Figure 4a) and stronger EL light emission (vide infra) and within this regime, eq 1 predicts experimental I−V curves for devices with all five CdSe shell thicknesses and across the entire E app range measured here (Figure 4b). The fits to our data using eq 1 produce parameters summarized in Table 2 that are physically reasonable including barrier heights in the range from 0.59 to 0.67 eV that are in the range of barriers reported for macroscopic CdSe−Au Schottky barriers 36 and CdSe− PEDOT:PSS Schottky barriers. 37 The tentative conclusion is that in the Au−CdSe−PEDOT:PSS device, the two Schottky junctions are in full control of carrier transport.…”
Section: Table 2 Fitting Parameters For the Calculation Of I−v Curvesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In (1) and ( 2), q is the element charge constant, V is bias voltage, n is the ideality factor, T is the absolute temperature, k is the Boltzmann constant, φB is the SBH, and A* is the effective Richardson's constant (9.2 A•cm −2 •K −2 ) for InAlAs. 23 The SBH is calculated from Js obtained from the measured value and is defined as:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%