2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-dependent absorptance of painted aluminum, stainless steel 304, and titanium for 1.07 μm and 10.6 μm laser beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a wavelength of 10.6 µm the energy coupling efficiency is completely independent of the underlying process temperature. The measured trend in our experiments is identical compared to results in the literature [24], however, our values are lower. This can be a consequence of the much smaller surface roughness [7] of our used probes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a wavelength of 10.6 µm the energy coupling efficiency is completely independent of the underlying process temperature. The measured trend in our experiments is identical compared to results in the literature [24], however, our values are lower. This can be a consequence of the much smaller surface roughness [7] of our used probes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…While below approximately 1000 °C the coupling efficiency is independent of the temperature, above this temperature a slight decrease of efficiency was measured. The temperature independent energy coupling efficiency is in good agreement with the results for the absorptivity at temperatures below 600 °C in [24]. As mentioned before, the decrease of the absorptivity below the melting point was attributed to a cleaning effect of the surface [21].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4.34 it is shown that the first material removal, which is related to molten titanium, starts at laser powers of about 2.4 W. This removal is mainly the result of melt pool dynamics that throw out molten material from the center to the outer sides and is governed by temperatures that exceed the melting point of titanium (>1668°C). This can be explained by a sudden jump in the absorption coefficient by temperatures >800°C from 40% to >70% [Kwo12]. Figure 4.35 shows the resulting removal velocities v rem in titanium in dependence on the electrolyte used.…”
Section: Sustainable Electrolytes For Lcmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal conductivity, specific heat, and absorption are considered as functions of temperature. 22,23 These properties are updated at each time step in a numerical algorithm which makes them a function of space (eq. 2).…”
Section: A Temperature Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%