2017
DOI: 10.1134/s1063776117120159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Dependence of the Upper Critical Field in Disordered Hubbard Model with Attraction

Abstract: We study disorder effects upon the temperature behavior of the upper critical magnetic field in attractive Hubbard model within the generalized DMFT+Σ approach. We consider the wide range of attraction potentials U -from the weak coupling limit, where superconductivity is described by BCS model, up to the strong coupling limit, where superconducting transition is related to Bose -Einstein condensation (BEC) of compact Cooper pairs, formed at temperatures significantly higher than superconducting transition tem… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For orbital critical magnetic field (cf. [28]) in the same model, for the same coupling strength and T → 0, for a characteristic value of lattice parameter a = 3.3 * 10 −8 cm, we obtain H c2 ≈ 1.6 * 10 8 Gauss. Thus, the orbital critical magnetic field at low temperatures increases with coupling strength much faster than paramagnetic field and in BEC limit the main contribution to the upper critical magnetic field at low temperatures will be due to paramagnetic effect.…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of Paramagnetic Critical Fieldsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For orbital critical magnetic field (cf. [28]) in the same model, for the same coupling strength and T → 0, for a characteristic value of lattice parameter a = 3.3 * 10 −8 cm, we obtain H c2 ≈ 1.6 * 10 8 Gauss. Thus, the orbital critical magnetic field at low temperatures increases with coupling strength much faster than paramagnetic field and in BEC limit the main contribution to the upper critical magnetic field at low temperatures will be due to paramagnetic effect.…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of Paramagnetic Critical Fieldsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Let us consider disorder influence on the temperature dependence of the upper critical field H c2 (T ) in a wide region of attraction strength U , including the BCS -BEC crossover region, as well as for the wide interval of disorders, up to the vicinity of Anderson transition [28]. In Nozieres -Schmitt-Rink approach used here the critical temperature of superconducting transition is determined by a joint solution of equation for Cooper instability in Cooper particle -particle channel in weak coupling approximation and equation for the chemical potential of the system, which is defined for the whole interval of the values of Hubbard interaction from the condition of quarter -filling of the band within DMFT+Σ approximation.…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of the Orbital Upper Critical Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To introduce the effect of magnetic field H, we only have to replace the condition for divergence of the uniform superconducting susceptibility [Eq. ( 2)] with that for divergence of a finitemomentum superconducting susceptibility [27]…”
Section: Pair-formation Vortex-liquid-formation and Vortex-lattice-fo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more general approach, described in Ref. [34], suggests that linear H c − T c relation in the wide temperature range can be observed for systems with strong pairing interaction. According to the phase diagram of SC in Cd 3 As 2 [15,17], the type of pairing potential (evenor odd-parity) depends not on the integral strength of ee attraction, but rather on the relation between intraand inter-orbital components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%