1970
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.19700400119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Dependence of the Structure of Liquid Mercury

Abstract: X‐ray diffraction patterns have been obtained from liquid mercury at −35, 15, and 80 °C. The structure factors obtained are nearly independent on temperature and applied to a discussion of the electrical resistivity using Ziman's [16] theory and the pseudopotential (Animalu and Heine [19] or Evans et al. [18]).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter ( E = (T -T,t)/T,) is the ratio of the desired temperature T t o the liquid range T,, where T , t is the melting point. This method was reported in our previous paper for liquid mercury and lead [15]. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The parameter ( E = (T -T,t)/T,) is the ratio of the desired temperature T t o the liquid range T,, where T , t is the melting point. This method was reported in our previous paper for liquid mercury and lead [15]. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Samples were heated in a boron nitride (BN) crucible ( 3 0 x 2 0 mm2) and in an Ar-lO% H, atmosphere in the high-temperature camera as shown in Fig. 1 [5]. Before each run the sample was heated to 700 "C, where the oxide was reduced by the atmosphere used, and then brought to the desired temperature within *5 "C. The crucible size made it possible to obtain a fairly flat surface area, about lox 10 mm2, regardless of the surface tension of the metal under investigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76 Wagner, Ocken & Joshi (1965) 2.27 3.41 Kaplow, Strong & Averbach (1965) 2.33 3.43 Ocken & Wagner (1966) 2"31 3"51 Rivlin, Waghorne & Williams (1966) 2-31 3.77 Halder & Wagner (1967) 2.29 3"48 Halder & Wagner (1968) 2.29 3. 48 Caputi, Rodriquez & Pings (1968) 2.38 2.78 Waseda & Suzuki (1970) 2.32 3.34 Ruppersberg & Reiter (1972) 2.31 3.58 This work 2.33 2.68 treatment, produce superposable results. The major advantages of the energy-scanning technique fall into two catagories.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Energy-scanning Techniquementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The strong correlation between the data obtained from the two methods is apparent. The energyscanning result has been compared also with recent existing data* (Black & Cundall, 1965;Wagner, Ocken & Joshi, 1965;Ocken & Wagner, 1966;Rivlin, Waghorne & Williams, 1966;Halder & Wagner, 1967Caputi, Rodriquez & Pings, 1968;Waseda & Suzuki, 1970;Ruppersberg & Reiter, 1972). Both the peak positions and the value of si(s) at each peak correlate well.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Energy-scanning Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%