1982
DOI: 10.1021/j100394a022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of the ozone absorption coefficient in the Hartley continuum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…because the absorption is less sensitive to vibrationally excited ozone at this wavelength than at 254 nm[Astholz et al, 1982]. All absorption transients were results of single pulse experiments.Partial pressures in the cell of less than I bar were measured by a MKS 122AA-01000AB pressure transducer coupled to a MKS PDR-C-2C instrument with a resolution of 10 -3 mbar.…”
contrasting
confidence: 98%
“…because the absorption is less sensitive to vibrationally excited ozone at this wavelength than at 254 nm[Astholz et al, 1982]. All absorption transients were results of single pulse experiments.Partial pressures in the cell of less than I bar were measured by a MKS 122AA-01000AB pressure transducer coupled to a MKS PDR-C-2C instrument with a resolution of 10 -3 mbar.…”
contrasting
confidence: 98%
“…1). This wavelength corresponds to the center of the Hartley absorption band [15]. The dependence of ozone concentration on flow rate of oxygen was investigated for constant voltage applied to the electrodes.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fraction of this flow, which was controlled by MFC4 (Tylan FC-260), was introduced into the flow tube. The ozone concentration in the stream exiting the ozonolyzer that was not introduced in the flow tube was determined by UV-Visible absorption at l = 254 nm using UVIKON 930 Spectrophotometer fit with a glass cell with 10 cm long quartz windows (the cross section of ozone, s O 3 , is 1.129 Â 10 À17 cm 2 molecule À1 ), 32 and the ozone concentration in the flow tube was estimated considering the molar fraction of ozone. This estimation was checked using an UV Absorption Ozone Analyzer (SIR S-5014) and a calibration factor was applied to correct for possible wall losses in the sampling tubes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%