2017
DOI: 10.3103/s106287381712022x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of the optical transitions of PbS quantum dots in silicate glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Figure a, the PL peak of PbS QDs was blue-shifted to ∼19.9 meV, and it is approximately linear for T > 80 K. The energy shift at T > 80 K was calculated and can be described by a temperature coefficient of α PbS = 0.1 meV/K. This value is smaller than that of the bulk PbS (α = 0.52 meV/K), but it is comparable to that in the reported studies of thiol-capped PbS QDs (α = 0.3meV/K) and PbS QDs in glass (α = 0.2 meV/K) . For the PbS/MnS QD sample, the value of α PbS/MnS becomes significantly smaller than that for PbS QDs, which is 0.05 meV/K.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Figure a, the PL peak of PbS QDs was blue-shifted to ∼19.9 meV, and it is approximately linear for T > 80 K. The energy shift at T > 80 K was calculated and can be described by a temperature coefficient of α PbS = 0.1 meV/K. This value is smaller than that of the bulk PbS (α = 0.52 meV/K), but it is comparable to that in the reported studies of thiol-capped PbS QDs (α = 0.3meV/K) and PbS QDs in glass (α = 0.2 meV/K) . For the PbS/MnS QD sample, the value of α PbS/MnS becomes significantly smaller than that for PbS QDs, which is 0.05 meV/K.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This value is smaller than that of the bulk PbS (α = 0.52 meV/K), but it is comparable to that in the reported studies of thiol-capped PbS QDs (α = 0.3meV/K) 30 and PbS QDs in glass (α = 0.2 meV/K). 34 For the PbS/MnS QD sample, the value of α PbS/MnS becomes significantly smaller than that for PbS QDs, which is 0.05 meV/K. This result is expected due to the negative value of α in MnS bulk (α MnS = −2 meV/K).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Based on Figure 4(b), PL peak energy was redshifted when the temperature is increased from 20 K to 60 K, while it blue-shifted from T >80 K. The energy shifts for temperature higher than 80 K can be described by a temperature coefficient, α = dE g /dT = 0.1 meV/K. This value is smaller compared to bulk PbS (α = 0.52 meV/K), but is comparable to that reported in previous study of thiol-capped PbS QDs (α = 0.3meV/K) and PbS QDs in glass (α = 0.2 meV/K) (Litvyak et al 2017;Turyanska et al 2007). Usually, the temperature dependence of the PL peak position can well be described by Varshni equation (Varshni 1967),…”
Section: Photoluminescence Temperature Dependence Of the Colloidalsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, the value of α for the PbS/MnTe compound QDs decreased slightly ( α = 0.11 meV/K). Generally, the value of dE / dT is mainly attributed to the thermal expansion coefficient and electron–phonon interactions [ 35 , 36 ]. In specific terms, the value of the thermal expansion coefficient of bulk MnTe (−3.42 meV/K) was smaller than that of PbS in bulk (0.52 meV/K).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%