2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2018.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of the dielectric function of monolayer MoS2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the intensity of the signal is lower than the experimental one, and the second expected excitonic transition c2-v1 is not visible because of the overlap with the A peak. The present data are also in line with thermal ellipsometry data at 35 K measured by Le et al (2019), who measured A = 2.91 eV and the K-K 0 transition at 1.96 eV.…”
Section: Optical Response Functionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, the intensity of the signal is lower than the experimental one, and the second expected excitonic transition c2-v1 is not visible because of the overlap with the A peak. The present data are also in line with thermal ellipsometry data at 35 K measured by Le et al (2019), who measured A = 2.91 eV and the K-K 0 transition at 1.96 eV.…”
Section: Optical Response Functionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These are the excited excitonic states, marked as B 2s and B 3s . These peaks were not observed in previously reported ellipsometric data analysis of single-layer MoS 2 [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], but they have been identified in photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy [48]. We have been able to extract the B 2s peak from ellipsometry measurements by numerically Table II and in Table III.…”
Section: Comparison Of Computed and Measured χ And σmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The excitonic peak structure of the dielectric functions shown in Figure 5 is similar to that reported in previous works. 37−39,49,57−62 However, the amplitude of the A, B, and C peaks in ε i is much lower than in the case of large-area MoS 2 monolayers 39,58,59,61,63,64 and few layers. [37][38][39]45,57,62 The amplitude of ε i shows a complex behavior with the increasing number of layers, 37,39 and it exhibits a "W" like profile as a consequence of the different weights of decreasing excitonic effects, the increasing joint density of states, and the mass density increase in relatively thick MoS 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%