2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.104207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of the de Gennes narrowing in liquid rubidium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, above 420 K the rigidness of liquid rubidium decreases with a higher rate than at lower temperature. That softening of the generalised elastic modulus agrees with a reduction in generalised viscosity in this temperature range, although both experiments are monitoring different spatial correlations [9]. …”
Section: Lam-16supporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Apparently, above 420 K the rigidness of liquid rubidium decreases with a higher rate than at lower temperature. That softening of the generalised elastic modulus agrees with a reduction in generalised viscosity in this temperature range, although both experiments are monitoring different spatial correlations [9]. …”
Section: Lam-16supporting
confidence: 61%
“…The longitudinal viscosity is a measure for the diffusion of momentum parallel to the velocity of the particles and can be regarded as being sensitive to long lasting atomic-level stress correlations, in our case, on next neighbor distances. The evaluation of η l (Q) showed a step-like increase of the generalised viscosity with decreasing temperature at around 400 K [9]. In addition, MD-simulations of generalized viscosities at the structure factor maximum demonstrated a similar increase with decreasing temperature [29].…”
Section: Lam-16mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One is the neutron scattering evidences by Demmel et al for a dynamical crossover in liquid Rb [40], Pb [41], and Al [42] at around 1.5T m which happens to coincide Figure 5 of this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%