1976
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(76)90300-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of surface conductance and a model of vicinal (interfacial) water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Bek and Jakobsson (1994) calculated the Coulomb repulsion between ions in a cylindrical channel, using a dielectric constant of 20. A biological vestibule contains ϳ500 water molecules, and when such a small number of molecules are confined in a space, some of the macroscopic properties of such "vicinal water" are known to differ appreciably from those determined in bulk water (Schufle et al, 1976;Drost-Hansen and Singleton, 1992). A small decrease in the dielectric constant of a liquid leads to a similar increase in the potential profile (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Bek and Jakobsson (1994) calculated the Coulomb repulsion between ions in a cylindrical channel, using a dielectric constant of 20. A biological vestibule contains ϳ500 water molecules, and when such a small number of molecules are confined in a space, some of the macroscopic properties of such "vicinal water" are known to differ appreciably from those determined in bulk water (Schufle et al, 1976;Drost-Hansen and Singleton, 1992). A small decrease in the dielectric constant of a liquid leads to a similar increase in the potential profile (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3. Calculated difference spectra, that Is, the spectra of continuum for 1 M HCI, effective thickness 25.5 ± 0.5 µ absorbed in quartz pores (1), and for film of 1 M HCI, thickness 25.4 ± 0.5 µ between parallel quartz plates (2). A special holder was used in all cases to avoid evaporation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of CUPs ranges from 0.43 to 0.77 nm, which is about two to four water molecules thick. While previous studies have been suggested that surface water is as thick as from a few water molecules to several dozens of water molecules depending on the particles surface properties [ 75 , 76 ]. The thickness is likely to be primarily controlled by the charge density of the CUP particle surface and any hydrogen bonding groups at the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%