2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.233101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of magnetization-induced second harmonic generation at buried exchange-biased interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the antiferromagnetic layer it cannot exclude the existence of the spin glass state, which may exhibit a high m AF and stores energy to stabilize magnetic states, even m AF misaligned with êAF [46]. In CoO/Cu/Fe multilayers, below T B pinned uncompensated spins exist, even for a Cu thickness of 3.5 nm, irrespective of the exchange bias [64], and in TbFebased exchange bias systems, such pinning is responsible ) for an antiferromagnetic layer with selected combinations of anisotropy constant (K AF ), easy-axis direction with respect to the cooling-field direction (θ), exchange constant (J AF ), and layer thickness (t AF ), where the error bars are determined by randomly selected 30 sets of initial configurations in the simulation. In the reference antiferromagnetic layer in (a), (b), K AF = 3 × 10 7 erg cm −3 , θ = 0 • , J AF = 2 × 10 −6 erg cm −1 , and t AF = 4 monolayers (ML) were set, and the other curves are labeled by the parameter adopted differing from the reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the antiferromagnetic layer it cannot exclude the existence of the spin glass state, which may exhibit a high m AF and stores energy to stabilize magnetic states, even m AF misaligned with êAF [46]. In CoO/Cu/Fe multilayers, below T B pinned uncompensated spins exist, even for a Cu thickness of 3.5 nm, irrespective of the exchange bias [64], and in TbFebased exchange bias systems, such pinning is responsible ) for an antiferromagnetic layer with selected combinations of anisotropy constant (K AF ), easy-axis direction with respect to the cooling-field direction (θ), exchange constant (J AF ), and layer thickness (t AF ), where the error bars are determined by randomly selected 30 sets of initial configurations in the simulation. In the reference antiferromagnetic layer in (a), (b), K AF = 3 × 10 7 erg cm −3 , θ = 0 • , J AF = 2 × 10 −6 erg cm −1 , and t AF = 4 monolayers (ML) were set, and the other curves are labeled by the parameter adopted differing from the reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%