2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of magnetic anisotropy in a cylindrical Fe65Pd35 nanowire array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deriving the difference between the M ZFC and M FC magnetization curves (∂[ M ZFC − M FC ]/∂ T ) gives the profile of the blocking temperature T B distribution, which is related to the energy barrier distribution in the sample. 31 The inset of Fig. 4b shows T B appears at the clear peak of 10 K, indicating that a magnetic contribution is blocked below 10 K. The anisotropy constant at 300 K was calculated to be 2.32 × 10 4 J m −3 according to the Law of Approach to Magnetic Saturation method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deriving the difference between the M ZFC and M FC magnetization curves (∂[ M ZFC − M FC ]/∂ T ) gives the profile of the blocking temperature T B distribution, which is related to the energy barrier distribution in the sample. 31 The inset of Fig. 4b shows T B appears at the clear peak of 10 K, indicating that a magnetic contribution is blocked below 10 K. The anisotropy constant at 300 K was calculated to be 2.32 × 10 4 J m −3 according to the Law of Approach to Magnetic Saturation method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%