“…The calculated heat of fusion of Mg and Al are 9.6 kJ/mole and 11.7 kJ/mole, respectively, which are close to the experimental data of 8.95 kJ/mole and 10.79 kJ/mole [20]. In addition, for the present purpose it is important to note that the AEAM has been shown to give a good description of the surface energies, interlayer relaxation and the surface phonons of various metals surfaces [12][13][14]21]. …”
Using molecular dynamics simulations and an analytic embedded-atom method, a comparative study of the surface anharmonicity for the close-packed surface of Mg (0001) and Al (111) is presented in the temperature range from 0 K to their melting temperatures. The temperature dependences of the surface phonon frequencies, the mean square vibrational amplitudes of surface atoms and the layer structure factor are calculated. The calculated results are in good agreement with the available experimental data. Although with the same atomic arrangement for the top layer, Al(111) preserves its crystalline order in the temperature range considered, and Mg(0001) exhibits surface melting. The possible mechanism for the different melting behaviors of the two surfaces is discussed.
“…The calculated heat of fusion of Mg and Al are 9.6 kJ/mole and 11.7 kJ/mole, respectively, which are close to the experimental data of 8.95 kJ/mole and 10.79 kJ/mole [20]. In addition, for the present purpose it is important to note that the AEAM has been shown to give a good description of the surface energies, interlayer relaxation and the surface phonons of various metals surfaces [12][13][14]21]. …”
Using molecular dynamics simulations and an analytic embedded-atom method, a comparative study of the surface anharmonicity for the close-packed surface of Mg (0001) and Al (111) is presented in the temperature range from 0 K to their melting temperatures. The temperature dependences of the surface phonon frequencies, the mean square vibrational amplitudes of surface atoms and the layer structure factor are calculated. The calculated results are in good agreement with the available experimental data. Although with the same atomic arrangement for the top layer, Al(111) preserves its crystalline order in the temperature range considered, and Mg(0001) exhibits surface melting. The possible mechanism for the different melting behaviors of the two surfaces is discussed.
“…The interactions between nickel atoms are described by a modified analytic embedded atom method (MAEAM) [14][15][16][17], which has been proven to be effective in the simulations of surfaces [14], nanostructures [15,16] and bulk materials [17]. In the present MAEAM, based on the early work of Johnson [18], we introduce a modified energy term M(P) to express the difference between the actual total energy of a system of atoms and that calculated from the original EAM using a linear superposition of spherical atomic electron densities.…”
“…Our group proposed another modified method [14]. With introducing a modified energy term M(P) to the total energy expression to express the energy difference resulting from the electron density difference and to correct the negative Cauchy relation, a new type of modified analytic EAM (MAEAM) has been constructed for almost all typical metals [15][16][17][18][19][20]. We have developed and used our own MAEAM potential of fcc δ Pu to carry out MD simulation of small helium bubbles in Pu [21].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.