2018 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/la-cci.2018.8625245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and Relative Humidity Prediction in Swine Livestock Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with our study, both the accuracy and validation was limited in the previous studies. Likewise, [ 10 ] proposed an ANN-based MLP model to predict the temperature and relative humidity of a swine building. The study validates the model by MSE and MAE; the IRH’s RMSE was better than our proposed model (RMSE = 0.8310), whereas the IAT’s RMSE was inferior (RMSE = 0.8095).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When compared with our study, both the accuracy and validation was limited in the previous studies. Likewise, [ 10 ] proposed an ANN-based MLP model to predict the temperature and relative humidity of a swine building. The study validates the model by MSE and MAE; the IRH’s RMSE was better than our proposed model (RMSE = 0.8310), whereas the IAT’s RMSE was inferior (RMSE = 0.8095).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heretofore researchers developed several models as dynamic, steady-state models, heat balance equations, computational fluid dynamics to predict indoor air temperature (IAT), and indoor relative humidity (IRH). Most of the previous models were developed by using the theoretical relationship between heat and mass transfer functions, energy-oriented facets, and indoor fluid dynamics [ 3 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Such mechanisms require complex information such as airflow dynamics, animal information, and fan specifications to derive the equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations