1974
DOI: 10.1002/jez.1401870304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and prolactin as control factors in newt forelimb regeneration

Abstract: Temperature and prolactin were studied as control factors i n the process of newt forelimb regeneration. Temperature was varied i n five steps from 10" to 30°C under otherwise constant environmental conditions. Longitudinal new growth and limb differentiation were observed. Temperature was found to have a profound effect upon both developmental processes. Maximal longitudinal new growth resulting from changes i n temperature alone occurred at 2 5°C with maximal limb differentiation a t 30°C. At each temperatur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on Hydra (Peebles, ), planarians (Brøndsted and Brøndsted, ), fiddler crabs (Weis, ), and urodele amphibians (Schauble and Nentwig, ; Young et al, ; Tattersall et al, ) have also described a temperature‐based influence on the rate of regeneration. Similarly, the separation of regeneration into “wound healing” and “regenerating” phases was seen in newts (Schauble and Nentwig, ; Tattersall et al, ), salamanders (Bryant et al, ; Gardiner et al, ), and planarians (Brøndsted and Brøndsted, ); however, although the wound healing phase in newts also appeared to be temperature independent (Schauble and Nentwig, ; Tattersall et al, ), that of the planarians appeared to vary with temperature, although this is difficult to assess from the published data (Brøndsted and Brøndsted, ). Recent work in Nematostella has shown that, in bisection of juvenile polyps (5–10 mm in length), cell proliferation begins to increase roughly 24 hpa (at 22°C), reaching a maximum at roughly 48 hpa (Passamaneck and Martindale, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies on Hydra (Peebles, ), planarians (Brøndsted and Brøndsted, ), fiddler crabs (Weis, ), and urodele amphibians (Schauble and Nentwig, ; Young et al, ; Tattersall et al, ) have also described a temperature‐based influence on the rate of regeneration. Similarly, the separation of regeneration into “wound healing” and “regenerating” phases was seen in newts (Schauble and Nentwig, ; Tattersall et al, ), salamanders (Bryant et al, ; Gardiner et al, ), and planarians (Brøndsted and Brøndsted, ); however, although the wound healing phase in newts also appeared to be temperature independent (Schauble and Nentwig, ; Tattersall et al, ), that of the planarians appeared to vary with temperature, although this is difficult to assess from the published data (Brøndsted and Brøndsted, ). Recent work in Nematostella has shown that, in bisection of juvenile polyps (5–10 mm in length), cell proliferation begins to increase roughly 24 hpa (at 22°C), reaching a maximum at roughly 48 hpa (Passamaneck and Martindale, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The two distinct phases of regeneration, the first being temperature independent (Stages 0-2) and the other being temperature dependent (Stages 2-5), suggest that the metabolic demands on wound closure are low, compared with the metabolically intensive morphological restructuring occurring at the later regeneration stages. Previous studies on Hydra (Peebles, 1898), planarians (Brïndsted and Brïndsted, 1961), fiddler crabs (Weis, 1976), and urodele amphibians (Schauble and Nentwig, 1974;Young et al, 1983;Tattersall et al, 2012) have also described a temperature-based influence on the rate of regeneration. Similarly, the separation of regeneration into "wound healing" and "regenerating" phases was seen in newts (Schauble and Nentwig, 1974;Tattersall et al, 2012), salamanders Gardiner et al, 2002), and planarians (Brïndsted and Brïndsted, 1961); however, although the wound healing phase in newts also appeared to be temperature independent (Schauble and Nentwig, 1974;Tattersall et al, 2012), that of the planarians appeared to vary with temperature, although this is difficult to assess from the published data (Brïndsted and Brïndsted, 1961).…”
Section: Developmental Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, it has been shown that adult landphase forms will survive for only 2 to 3 months under conditions usually employed for studies on regeneration in aquatic forms (Scadding, 1977). Since studies pertaining to regeneration rates in newts have shown that the rates are greatly affected by adverse environmental conditions (Schauble, 1972;Schauble and Nentwig, 1974;Maier and Singer, 19771, it seems plausible that the reported inability of the adult land-phase salamander to regenerate a limb may be due to adverse laboratory conditions rather than actual loss of the intrinsic capacity to regenerate. The present study was initiated to determine what environmental conditions were necessary for long-term survival of adult land-phase Ambystoma salamanders in the laboratory and whether regeneration would occur in animals maintained under those conditions for prolonged periods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature alters rates of biochemical reactions in ectotherms in an exponential manner, affecting physiological functions such as metabolic rate, muscle activity, blood flow, digestion, and wound healing. Schauble and Nentwig (') observed that the rate of forelimb regeneration increased with increasing temperature, with low temperatures (10°C) effectively inhibiting regeneration. These findings are similar to thermal effects on limb regeneration in fiddler crabs (Weis, ').…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are similar to thermal effects on limb regeneration in fiddler crabs (Weis, '). Schauble and Nentwig (') also explored regeneration by examining both the rate of tissue growth as well as the rate of differentiation. Rate of growth measured the amount of new tissue produced from regenerating forelimbs over time, while the rate of differentiation measured the animal's limb morphology on a scale from 1 (wound healing) to 13 (completed differentiating).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%