16th Joint Propulsion Conference 1980
DOI: 10.2514/6.1980-1166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and pressure sensitivity of aluminized propellants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitatively, the experimental data also follows trends similar to studies of aluminized propellants performed by [26] and verifies models presented by [27,28] where the authors argue that the temperature sensitivity of aluminized propellants is driven by 1) aluminum powder acting as a heat sink in the condensed phase; higher concentrations reduce temperature sensitivity, and 2) burning aluminum radiating heat back to the surface; higher aluminum content increases the pressure exponent n, and p . Inspection of the experimental data indicates that propellant B3 clearly follows mechanism 1 since the sensitivity is low despite having a high n, whereas B1 and B2 illustrate a balance between the two mechanisms: a transition is clearly present.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Qualitatively, the experimental data also follows trends similar to studies of aluminized propellants performed by [26] and verifies models presented by [27,28] where the authors argue that the temperature sensitivity of aluminized propellants is driven by 1) aluminum powder acting as a heat sink in the condensed phase; higher concentrations reduce temperature sensitivity, and 2) burning aluminum radiating heat back to the surface; higher aluminum content increases the pressure exponent n, and p . Inspection of the experimental data indicates that propellant B3 clearly follows mechanism 1 since the sensitivity is low despite having a high n, whereas B1 and B2 illustrate a balance between the two mechanisms: a transition is clearly present.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Regardless of observations and postulates about the lack of aluminum combustion heat feedback affecting the burn rate in higher burn rate AP propellants, the relatively low-burn rates and large, "slow-lifting" agglomerates of the propellants studied here apparently do influence the burn rate. This trend supports the Petite Ensemble Model as extended for aluminum, 16 rather than the approaches that consider aluminum merely as a heat sink. This is consistent with the greater sensitivity to acceleration of the burning process and the higher burn rate of the bimodal at the same average distribution.…”
Section: Ap Average Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 92%
“…As noted by Miller 15 and Osborn, 16 these effects can be summarized as a combination of the changes due to the average AP size and the width of the particle size distributions. In general, the larger the average size of the AP, the more agglomeration and the lower the burn rate.…”
Section: Ap Average Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We know from the discussion in section 3.1 that SAl×s acting place locates on the combustion surface and its approaching area, where the surface-melting layer forms when the propellant burns. Since the temperature of this layer is between 600 and 900 K (5) , and SAl will significantly release heat near 600 8C (illustrated in Figure 1), the effect of SAl to raise the propellant×s burning rate is therefore attributed to SAl×s combustion and its released heat. During the combustion process, the thickness of the surface-melting layer will decrease with the increase of pressure, so will the condensed-phase reaction fraction.…”
Section: Thermal Analysis Of Powdered Aluminummentioning
confidence: 99%