1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00376087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and pressure dependence of Fe-Mg partitioning between garnet and phengite, with particular reference to eclogites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
1
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the ACF-deluxe chemography in Figure 6 (Thompson 1982), where the composition of calculated pre-Alpine amphibolite-facies minerals is reported, bulk Mineral abbreviations are as proposed by Kretz (1983). O = Ti content in amphibole according to Otten (1984); P = garnet/amphibole Fe-Mg exchange according to Perchuk (1991); GP = garnet/amphibole Fe-Mg exchange according to Graham and Powell (1984); EGP = garnet/clinopyroxene Fe-Mg exchange according to Ellis and Green (1979) after (Powell 1985); K = garnet/clinopyroxene Fe-Mg exchange according to Krogh Ravna (2000); K&R = garnet/white mica Fe-Mg exchange according to Krogh and Råheim (1978); PS = amphibole compositions experimentally determined during amphibolites-to-eclogite transition according to Poli (1993) and Schmidt (1993); S = white mica compositions experimentally determined during amphibolites-to-eclogite transition according to Schmidt (1993); HZ, H, JR = Al tot content in amphibole according to Hammarstrom and Zen (1986), Hollister et al (1987), and Johnson and Rutherford (1989), respectively. compositions are aligned along the join between plagioclase and hornblende, as expected for amphibolite-facies metabasites. This suggests that different modal amounts of hornblende and plagioclase, and the accompanying minerals diopside, orthopyroxene, biotite, and quartz, characterized the pre-eclogitic assemblage.…”
Section: Bulk Chemistry Versus Modal Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the ACF-deluxe chemography in Figure 6 (Thompson 1982), where the composition of calculated pre-Alpine amphibolite-facies minerals is reported, bulk Mineral abbreviations are as proposed by Kretz (1983). O = Ti content in amphibole according to Otten (1984); P = garnet/amphibole Fe-Mg exchange according to Perchuk (1991); GP = garnet/amphibole Fe-Mg exchange according to Graham and Powell (1984); EGP = garnet/clinopyroxene Fe-Mg exchange according to Ellis and Green (1979) after (Powell 1985); K = garnet/clinopyroxene Fe-Mg exchange according to Krogh Ravna (2000); K&R = garnet/white mica Fe-Mg exchange according to Krogh and Råheim (1978); PS = amphibole compositions experimentally determined during amphibolites-to-eclogite transition according to Poli (1993) and Schmidt (1993); S = white mica compositions experimentally determined during amphibolites-to-eclogite transition according to Schmidt (1993); HZ, H, JR = Al tot content in amphibole according to Hammarstrom and Zen (1986), Hollister et al (1987), and Johnson and Rutherford (1989), respectively. compositions are aligned along the join between plagioclase and hornblende, as expected for amphibolite-facies metabasites. This suggests that different modal amounts of hornblende and plagioclase, and the accompanying minerals diopside, orthopyroxene, biotite, and quartz, characterized the pre-eclogitic assemblage.…”
Section: Bulk Chemistry Versus Modal Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exchange is inversely correlated with a 0-2 to 0-1 unit exchange of KNa_ ( towards paragonite. The Fe 2 + Mg_, exchange equilibrium between phengite and garnet has been studied experimentally by Krogh & Raheim (1978) and by Green & Hellman (1982) under reducing conditions where Fe 2+ = Fe to1 could be assumed. Natural phengites allow considerable exchange along Fe 3 + Al _,, but since some displacement towards tri-octahedral micas is possible as well, no unambiguous estimation of Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ from microprobe analysis is possible.…”
Section: Mineral Chemistry Of Primary Eclogitic Hydrosilicatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krogh, 1977;Evans & Trommsdorff, 1978;Evans et al, 1979;Ernst & Dal Piaz, 1978;Rubie, 1984). However, it is not clear whether any of these 'crustal' eclogites have indeed formed by dehydration of more hydrous mafic precursors, or whether they have crystallized under H 2 O-undersaturated conditions from primarily anhydrous protoliths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental determined reactions: [1] Lws + Jd = Pg + Ep/Zo + Qz + Vapor (Heinrich and Althaus, 1988) [2] maximum stability field of glaucophane (Maresch, 1997), [3] Ep + Ttn = Grt + Rt + Qz + H2O (Manning and Bohlen, 1991), and [4] amphiboles solid-solution (Otsuki and Banno, 1990). Garnet-phengite geothermometry: open square from Krogh and Raheim (1978) and open circle from Green and Hellman (1982). Geobarometry of phengite from Massonne and Schreyer (1987).…”
Section: J O Gmentioning
confidence: 99%