2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2014.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and photoperiod effects on sex determination in a fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Longer day lengths and lower temperatures induced higher proportions of females. This is the first case of a photoperiod-dependent sex determination system in fish [Brown et al, 2014]. Temperature and photoperiod seem to act in synergy in this fish to determine the sexual phenotype.…”
Section: Coexistence Of Genetic and Environmental Influencesmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Longer day lengths and lower temperatures induced higher proportions of females. This is the first case of a photoperiod-dependent sex determination system in fish [Brown et al, 2014]. Temperature and photoperiod seem to act in synergy in this fish to determine the sexual phenotype.…”
Section: Coexistence Of Genetic and Environmental Influencesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the Californian grunion fish, Leuresthes tenuis [Brown et al, 2014], both temperature and photoperiod can influence the sex ratio. However, because the seasonal thermal variation is very low (4 ° C) along the North American Pacific coast, photoperiod has become a more informative cue of season length than temperature.…”
Section: Coexistence Of Genetic and Environmental Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual photoperiod cycle is the main environmental zeitgeber influencing the reproductive cycle of salmonids (Taranger et al, ). Previous studies have demonstrated that the manipulation of photoperiod affects reproduction, growth rate and feeding behaviour in several species of salmonids without negative consequences (Boeuf & Le Bail, ; Brown, Baumann, & Conover, ). The primary mechanism underlying the delay of sexual maturation with photoperiod manipulation in salmonids remains unclear (Liu & Duston, ; Taranger et al, ), but it is suggested that the intensity and spectrum of light exposure affect the physiological responses of teleosts in areas such as growth, reproduction, behaviour and stress resistance (Boeuf & Le Bail, ; Karakatsouli et al, ; Migaud, Davie, & Taylor, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, determination of optimal environmental conditions would result in improved larval growth and survival rate and reduced rearing period and production cost. Among environmental factors, photoperiod is the most controllable variable in rearing condition and is well known to influence overall larval performance including feeding activity (Karlsen, Skiftesvik & Helvik, ), growth and survival (Barlow, Pearce, Rodgers & Clayton, ; Giri et al., ; Karakatsouli et al., ; Pedro Cañavate, Zerolo & Fernández‐Díaz, ; Puvanendran & Brown, ; Solbakken & Pittman, ; Stuart & Drawbridge, ; Villamizar, García‐Alcazar & Sánchez‐Vázquez, ), health (Kitawa et al., ), behaviour (Karlsen et al., ), swimming performance (Smiley & Parsons, ) and even sex ratio (Brown, Baumann & Conover, ). The response of fish larvae to photoperiod is a species‐specific characteristic and even their requirement to light may vary as they grow (Barlow et al., ; Boeuf & Bail, ; Puvanendran & Brown, ; Vallés & Estévez, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%