2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2016.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and field dependence of the flux pinning mechanisms in Fe 1.06 Te 0.6 Se 0.4 single crystal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The as-grown sample only exhibits a small hysteresis loop and the magnetisation decreases rapidly with increasing field below 0.5 T and continues to drop steadily above 0.5 T. Similar to the ZFC-FC measurements presented above, we found that air annealing drastically increased the observed magnetisation for the whole measured field range and the field loop is highly symmetric for increasing and decreasing field, which suggests the presence of strong bulk pinning [34][35][36][37]. For fields B>0.5 T, the magnetisation decreases very slowly with increasing field and contrary to previous reports of compounds with slightly different selenium content [16,[38][39][40][41], no secondary peak, also known as the fishtail-effect, is observed within the measured magnetic field range. Surprisingly, prolonged annealing led to a drastic change in the symmetry of the field loop (light blue curve).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The as-grown sample only exhibits a small hysteresis loop and the magnetisation decreases rapidly with increasing field below 0.5 T and continues to drop steadily above 0.5 T. Similar to the ZFC-FC measurements presented above, we found that air annealing drastically increased the observed magnetisation for the whole measured field range and the field loop is highly symmetric for increasing and decreasing field, which suggests the presence of strong bulk pinning [34][35][36][37]. For fields B>0.5 T, the magnetisation decreases very slowly with increasing field and contrary to previous reports of compounds with slightly different selenium content [16,[38][39][40][41], no secondary peak, also known as the fishtail-effect, is observed within the measured magnetic field range. Surprisingly, prolonged annealing led to a drastic change in the symmetry of the field loop (light blue curve).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For fields lower than 3 T, the strong pinning model starts to fail to describe satisfactorily the behavior of our data, its fits getting worse as the magnetic field decreases. It is important to underline that the morphological analysis performed on our sample (and on samples from the same batch) effectively confirms the presence of correlated disorder in terms of twin boundaries [31,32,46,81] (see figure 8), which can act as strong pinning centers at high field in particular, where the point-like defects are not effective anymore.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Bonura et al [37] observe δl type single pinning crossover (low fields) to strongly interacting vortices (high fields). Other studies on FeSeTe with peak effect using Dew-Hughes analysis [39] identify the presence of normal core point pinning centers, probably related to Fe-inclusion clusters, inhomogeneous Te dopant distribution and/or planar strong pinning centers (twin boundaries) [31][32][33]38], and finally even quantum creep effects [27]. It seems that in this case the peak effect is of a field-induced type as a consequence of the active role of the twin boundaries as strong pinning centers at high magnetic fields [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which can generate the interesting second magnetization peak phenomenon. It is characterized by an anomalous increasing trend of J c with increasing magnetic fields [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] which attracts even more interest to the samples presenting this phenomenon due to their capability to sustain high currents at high magnetic fields. In this work, we present an analysis of the pinning properties of a single crystal having twin boundaries in the case of a magnetic field applied along its largest face (H||ab).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%