1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.50.7007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and electric-field dependence of hopping transport in low-dimensional devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The functional proportionality of T c to the ratio (T 3 ES /T 2 M ) has been obtained earlier in Ref. [31,32], but with significantly different numerical coefficient. The latter is, however, crucial for comparison with experiment.…”
Section: Strong Localizationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The functional proportionality of T c to the ratio (T 3 ES /T 2 M ) has been obtained earlier in Ref. [31,32], but with significantly different numerical coefficient. The latter is, however, crucial for comparison with experiment.…”
Section: Strong Localizationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Our approach differs from those of other workers such as Monroe (1985Monroe ( , 1991 and Tiedje and Rose (1980). Our theory predicts that the mobility has three power-law decay branches whose exponents are given as À 1, À 1 and À À 1.…”
Section: Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Here is a parameter which is directly dependent on temperature. Theoretical analysis to understand the above power law was carried out by Schmidlin (1977), Silver and Cohen (1977) and Tiedje and Rose (1980). It was concluded that this power law behaviour in the amorphous solids is due to the multiple trapping mechanism in an exponential DOS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The good agreement shows the correctness of the obtained numerical coefficient. The functional proportionality of Tc to the ratio TES 3 /TM 2 has been obtained earlier [40,41], but with significantly different numerical coefficient. The latter is, however, crucial 15 for comparison with experiment.…”
Section: Strong Localizationmentioning
confidence: 81%