2019
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2019.1611941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and desorption mode matter in capacitive deionization process for water desalination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature effects, energetic properties, and systemic resistances have been analyzed in other studies. Huang and Tang [75] revealed that high temperature fastened desalination rate but affected the adsorption capacity of CDI. Energy consumption of MCDI is determined by water recovery and salt removal efficiency and can be improved with energy recovery [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature effects, energetic properties, and systemic resistances have been analyzed in other studies. Huang and Tang [75] revealed that high temperature fastened desalination rate but affected the adsorption capacity of CDI. Energy consumption of MCDI is determined by water recovery and salt removal efficiency and can be improved with energy recovery [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The desorption mode is an important factor to evaluate desorption rate within a cycle of adsorption–desorption. Huang and Tang (2020) estimated the effect of temperature of salt solution and desorption mode on electrosorption performance. The experiments were performed at four different temperatures, 15, 25, 35, and 45° C. There was higher ASAR at higher temperature with lower SAC.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Electrosorption Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Higher temperatures (45 vs 15 °C) have been found in CDI tests to enhance Na + adsorption and desorption rates but reduce the adsorption capacity of Na + . 17 In contrast, there was an improvement in adsorption capacity with increasing temperature of the electrode (from −20 to 60 °C) using porous activated carbon electrodes with an ionic liquid electrolyte. 18 Similarly, for a pseudocapacitor (PEDOT:PSS- coated graphene electrode), the capacity increased by ∼1.5 times, compared to 3.7 times for a capacitor (graphene electrode) with an increase in the temperature from room temperature to ∼39 °C.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In another CDI study using 20 mM NaCl, variable-temperature profiles of feed solution were shown to affect thermodynamic efficiencies by altering the ion structuring and extension charge storage dynamics within the electric double layer (EDL) . Higher temperatures (45 vs 15 °C) have been found in CDI tests to enhance Na + adsorption and desorption rates but reduce the adsorption capacity of Na + . In contrast, there was an improvement in adsorption capacity with increasing temperature of the electrode (from −20 to 60 °C) using porous activated carbon electrodes with an ionic liquid electrolyte .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%