2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(02)00458-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and density variations in the dusk and dawn plasmasphere as observed by interball tail in 1999 – 2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the DE models with Maxwellian VDFs for which the temperatures of the electrons and ions are uniform, DE models with Lorentzian VDFs have temperatures increasing with altitudes. Positive temperature gradients were first observed in the plasmasphere by Comfort (1986Comfort ( , 1996 and confirmed by the observations in Kotova et al (2002) and Bezrukikh et al (2003).…”
Section: The Exospheric Equilibrium Density Distributionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Contrary to the DE models with Maxwellian VDFs for which the temperatures of the electrons and ions are uniform, DE models with Lorentzian VDFs have temperatures increasing with altitudes. Positive temperature gradients were first observed in the plasmasphere by Comfort (1986Comfort ( , 1996 and confirmed by the observations in Kotova et al (2002) and Bezrukikh et al (2003).…”
Section: The Exospheric Equilibrium Density Distributionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…On the nightside, plasmaspheric ions flow downward into the ionosphere, enhancing the nightside N m F 2 peak in the ionosphere [ Singh and Singh , ; Carpenter and Lemaire , ; Pavlov and Pavlova , ]. Collectively, the movement of the high‐energy ions from the ionosphere to the plasmasphere and then back to the ionosphere on the nightside agrees with temperature measurements of ions and electrons in these regions [ Kotova et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Earlier the PL-48/ALPHA 3 data obtained by INTERBALL 1 were compared with DE-1/RIMS data (Kotova et al, 2002). Good agreement of these data confirmed the reliability of INTERBALL data.…”
Section: Sources Of Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 60%