2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41365-019-0692-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature analysis of the HTR-10 after full load rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The safety basis of the pebble-bed modular HTGR is that even if a single-module reactor loses cooling, the maximum temperature of the fuel element does not exceed 1620 °C, solely due to the heat conduction and heat radiation from the pebble core [9,10]. For the HTR-PM600, the design parameters, operating parameters, design criteria of the reactor module, and the associated reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) are exactly the same as those of the HTR-PM.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety basis of the pebble-bed modular HTGR is that even if a single-module reactor loses cooling, the maximum temperature of the fuel element does not exceed 1620 °C, solely due to the heat conduction and heat radiation from the pebble core [9,10]. For the HTR-PM600, the design parameters, operating parameters, design criteria of the reactor module, and the associated reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) are exactly the same as those of the HTR-PM.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to their significant inherent safety and applicability characteristics, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) have gradually played indispensable roles in nuclear reactor development [1][2][3]. HTGRs can be split into two types based on their core design: pebble-bed HTGRs, such as the high-temperature reactor pebble-bed module (HTR-PM) developed in China [4], and prismatic HTGRs, such as the modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR-350), developed in the US [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among existing technology roadmaps of space nuclear reactors, the gas-cooled nuclear reactor combined with a closed Brayton cycle is perceived as the most rational scheme for the system power exceeding 200 kW [4][5][6]; this is because it can achieve a higher energy conversion efficiency and a smaller specific mass. Typically, pure helium is adopted as the working fluid for the terrestrial Brayton cycle because of its excellent thermal and transport properties [7]. However, its small molecular weight inevitably results in a larger aerodynamic loading of the turbomachinery, which in turn increases the mass and volume of the system [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%