Temperamental differences between adolescents and young adults with or without an eating disorder

Matton, Annelies; Goossens, Lien; Vervaet, Myriam; Braet, Caroline

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.09.005

Cited by 21 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with this, empirical research using self‐report questionnaires indeed showed that heightened SP is a transdiagnostic feature of EDs (Harrison et al ., ; Matton, Goossens, Vervaet, & Braet, ). In contrast, because high SR is thought to be associated with impulsive approach behaviour and with a higher sensitivity to the rewarding effects of food, it has been argued that SR would be heightened in BN, but lowered in AN‐R (Harrison et al ., ; Matton et al ., ). However, the empirical evidence for the hypothesised role of SR in the various EDs is mixed (Harrison et al ., ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Glashouwer, Bloot, Veenstra, Franken, & De Jong, ). Many studies did not discriminate between AN‐R and AN‐B/P (Harrison et al ., ; Jappe et al ., ), those who did examine both ED types separately reported higher levels of SR in AN‐B/P compared with healthy controls (Glashouwer et al ., ) or suggested that the level of SR in AN‐B/P was situated in between the level of SR in AN‐R and BN (Matton et al ., ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sensitivity for Cues Predicting Reward and Punishment in Young Women with Eating Disorders

Matton

Jong

Goossens³

et al. 2017

Euro Eating Disorders Rev

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasing evidence shows that sensitivity to reward (SR) and punishment (SP) may be involved in eating disorders (EDs). Most studies used self-reported positive/negative effect in rewarding/punishing situations, whereas the implied proneness to detect signals of reward/punishment is largely ignored. This pilot study used a spatial orientation task to examine transdiagnostic and interdiagnostic differences in SR/SP. Participants (14-29 years) were patients with anorexia nervosa of restricting type (AN-R, n = 20), binge/purge ED group [AN of binge/purge type and bulimia nervosa (n = 16)] and non-symptomatic individuals (n = 23). Results revealed stronger difficulties to redirect attention away from signals of rewards in AN-R compared with binge/purge EDs, and binge/purge EDs showed stronger difficulties to direct attention away from signals of punishment compared with AN-R. Findings demonstrate interdiagnostic differences and show that the spatial orientation task is sensitive for individual differences in SP/SR within the context of EDs, thereby sustaining its usefulness as behavioural measure of reinforcement sensitivity. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Sensitivity for Cues Predicting Reward and Punishment in Young Women with Eating Disorders

Matton

Jong

Goossens³

et al. 2017

Euro Eating Disorders Rev

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Negative urgency has been revealed as a predictor of subsequent binge eating behavior in prepubescent youth [67] as well as a predictor of BN symptoms during the transition to young adulthood [68]. Sensitivity to punishment has been identified as a predictor of AN and BN in adolescent and young adult women, whereas sensitivity to reward discriminated BN from AN [69], which the authors posited may be linked to increased sensitivity to food cues and increased impulsivity among individuals with BN. In summary, research continues to suggest that relatively stable personality traits, which typically manifest during childhood, serve as potential ED precursors.…”

Section: Temperament and Personality-related Ed Risk Factorsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Recent Advances in Developmental and Risk Factor Research on Eating Disorders

Bakalar

Shank

Vannucci

et al. 2015

Curr Psychiatry Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (i.e., DSM-5) currently recognizes three primary eating disorders: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. The origins of eating disorders are complex and remain poorly understood. However, emerging research highlights a dimensional approach to understanding the multifactorial etiology of eating disorders as a means to inform assessment, prevention, and treatment efforts. Guided by research published since 2011, this review summarizes recent findings elucidating risk factors for the development of eating disorders across the lifespan in three primary domains: (1) genetic/biological, (2) psychological, and (3) socio-environmental. Prospective empirical research in clinical samples with full-syndrome eating disorders is emphasized with added support from cross-sectional studies, where relevant. The developmental stages of puberty and the transition from adolescence to young adulthood are discussed as crucial periods for the identification and prevention of eating disorders. The importance of continuing to elucidate the mechanisms underlying gene by environmental interactions in eating disorder risk is also discussed. Finally, controversial topics in the field of eating disorder research and the clinical implications of this research are summarized.

show abstract

“…Reward sensitivity is a personality trait that identifies individuals with increased vulnerability to disorders characterized by poor impulse control, including ADHD (Mitchell and Nelson-Gray, 2006), substance use, dependence or addiction (Knyazev, 2004;Franken et al, 2006;Pardo et al, 2007;Yen et al, 2012;Boog et al, 2014), eating disorders (Matton et al, 2013(Matton et al, , 2014Glashouwer et al, 2014), and cluster B personality disorders (Taylor et al, 2006;Pastor et al, 2007;Bijttebier et al, 2009). Conversely, a low degree of reward sensitivity is found in individuals with predisposition to depression (Kasch et al, 2002;Pinto-Meza et al, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterizing individual differences in reward sensitivity from the brain networks involved in response inhibition

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Temperamental differences between adolescents and young adults with or without an eating disorder

Cited by 21 publications

References 43 publications

Sensitivity for Cues Predicting Reward and Punishment in Young Women with Eating Disorders

Sensitivity for Cues Predicting Reward and Punishment in Young Women with Eating Disorders

Recent Advances in Developmental and Risk Factor Research on Eating Disorders

Characterizing individual differences in reward sensitivity from the brain networks involved in response inhibition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About