2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperament and psychopathological syndromes specific susceptibility for rubber hand illusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in line with these hypotheses, the findings related to the "Perception and Thinking Problems" domain, allows us to hypothesize that a sort of proclivity to put together ideas and visual images in a more idiosyncratic way might be added to the tendency to perceive the world less accurately increasing the mislocalization of the own hand toward the fake hand. It is worth noting that the association between these psychosisrelated processes in the Rorschach and the RHI is consistent with previous research that linked psychosis-proneness to RHI susceptibility (Asai et al, 2011;Thakkar et al, 2011;Germine et al, 2013;Kallai et al, 2015). Taken together, these data suggest that weaker body ownership, as indexed by the RHI, could be rooted in psychosis probe traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, in line with these hypotheses, the findings related to the "Perception and Thinking Problems" domain, allows us to hypothesize that a sort of proclivity to put together ideas and visual images in a more idiosyncratic way might be added to the tendency to perceive the world less accurately increasing the mislocalization of the own hand toward the fake hand. It is worth noting that the association between these psychosisrelated processes in the Rorschach and the RHI is consistent with previous research that linked psychosis-proneness to RHI susceptibility (Asai et al, 2011;Thakkar et al, 2011;Germine et al, 2013;Kallai et al, 2015). Taken together, these data suggest that weaker body ownership, as indexed by the RHI, could be rooted in psychosis probe traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Firstly, there is an extreme inter-individual variability in terms of RHI susceptibility within human population (Haans et al, 2012), with people reporting the illusion by simply seeing the fake hand (Rohde et al, 2011), others claiming its changing appearance (Lewis and Lloyd, 2010), others only having an impression of strangeness, and others experiencing no illusory experience at all (Wold et al, 2014). Secondly, the illusion strength is modulated by a variety of different additional factors other than the ones mentioned above: attentional fluctuations (Haans et al, 2012), interoceptive sensitivity (Tsakiris et al, 2011), temporal resolution in multisensory perception (Costantini et al, 2016), degree of empathic concern (Durgin et al, 2007;Asai et al, 2011), psychosis proneness (Asai et al, 2011;Thakkar et al, 2011;Germine et al, 2013;Kallai et al, 2015), malleability of body image (Eshkevari et al, 2012), emotional intelligence (Perepelkina et al, 2017) and hypnotic (Walsh et al, 2015)/sensory (Marotta et al, 2016) suggestibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain personality traits reportedly account for individual variability at the RHI [1820], including paranoid ideation, psychoticism predisposition, and interpersonal sensitivity [1820], which are not directly related to sensory perception, although the RHI is related to specific types of sensory stimulation (i.e., visual, tactile, and proprioceptive). The current study sheds new light on the factors influencing individual susceptibility to the RHI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have revealed large variability on both measures of the RHI across individuals, which is likely rooted in specific dispositional traits [1620]. However, despite the sensory nature of the RHI (i.e., visual, tactile, and proprioceptive), to our knowledge, no studies have investigated whether this variability could arise from an individual’s sensory suggestibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Interestingly, multisensory perceptual experiences predicted by the individual TBW 11 seem to be abnormal also in sub-clinical populations with high levels of schizotypy. 12,13 This suggests that lower temporal resolution in multisensory perception might be a behavioral marker of psychosis proneness. However, no study has investigated the TBW in schizotypy so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%