2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TEM investigation of the influence of dose rate on radiation damage and deuterium retention in tungsten

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stitched TEM images of these specimens can be found in the supplementary material (figures S5 and S6). The measured average dislocation densities (in the grain interior) are again almost the same in both materials: (2.2 ± 0.3) × 10 14 m −2 in the sample strained to 36% at 573 K and (2.1 ± 0.3) × 10 14 m −2 in the sample strained to 38% at 873 K. These dislocation densities are comparable with that in as-received hot-rolled W of (3.2 ± 1.7) × 10 14 m −2 [5], as well as with that in recrystallized W irradiated by 20 MeV W ions to 0.23 dpa [39]. Note that Manhard et al [5] counted not only dislocations in the grain interior (like in the present work), but also dislocation agglomerations near grain boundaries and dislocation walls.…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stitched TEM images of these specimens can be found in the supplementary material (figures S5 and S6). The measured average dislocation densities (in the grain interior) are again almost the same in both materials: (2.2 ± 0.3) × 10 14 m −2 in the sample strained to 36% at 573 K and (2.1 ± 0.3) × 10 14 m −2 in the sample strained to 38% at 873 K. These dislocation densities are comparable with that in as-received hot-rolled W of (3.2 ± 1.7) × 10 14 m −2 [5], as well as with that in recrystallized W irradiated by 20 MeV W ions to 0.23 dpa [39]. Note that Manhard et al [5] counted not only dislocations in the grain interior (like in the present work), but also dislocation agglomerations near grain boundaries and dislocation walls.…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Note that the sample temperatures during the plasma exposures used in the present study (370 K and 450 K) are below the operation temperature of most of the W components in ITER (the minimum temperature is determined by the cooling water inlet temperature of 343 K) [1,2]. Recently Chrominski et al [39] observed that, despite the different character and density of dislocations (lines and loops) observed in radiation-damaged W irradiated with different dose rates (to the same damage level), the D retention in the samples was essentially the same already at 295 K. It was concluded that radiation-induced dislocations play a little role in D retention in W. Hence, at material temperatures relevant for ITER and DEMO trapping at dislocations can be expected to yield a small contrib ution to H isotope retention in W.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…They have found detrapping energies ranging from 0.8 -1.2 eV for various dislocation structures, number of trapped HIs and for various number of trapped self-interstitial W atoms. Although some of these de-trapping energies are in line with our defect type II fill-level de-trapping energies the typical dislocation areal density found in such samples by TEM analysis [27,53] is around 10 14 m -2 . This is equivalent to a volumetric concentration of 10 -4 at.%.…”
Section: 2 Defect Type IIsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, this is unlikely as because most of the SIA atoms are lost to various free surfaces such as grain boundaries very quickly after the process of W irradiation because of their high mobility [45]- [48]. In samples which were treated in a manner similar to ours, the volumetric density of dislocations has been measured to be approximately 10 -4 at.% [9], [49]. Assuming all of the dislocations measured are of the SIA type, the measured density of dislocations provides an upper limit on the density of all SIAs that are available during our annealing process.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Displacement Damage Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 59%