The reactor pressure vessel, RPV, houses the reactor core and because of this function it has direct safety significance. The RPV is considered to be irreplaceable or prohibitively expensive to replace, which means that if the RPV degrades sufficiently it could be the operational life-limiting feature of a nuclear plant.In general, there are three main contributors in service embrittlement:Damage evolution in the form of vacancy and self interstitial atom (SIA) and clusters as a result of displacement cascades.Segregation of alloying elements Cu, Ni, Mn and Si, forming 2-3 nanometer clusters/precipitates and possible segregation of P to the grain boundaries.Environmental variables, irradiation dose, and dose rate and temperature.Currently, the RPV integrity is assessed using a fracture mechanics approach based on:1. The development of a Master Fracture Toughness Curve (ASME Code Case N-631 Section III).2. The determination of the ductile-brittle transition temperature shift in the master fracture toughness curve during in service.The determination of this temperature shift is the prime importance in ensuring the structural integrity of the RPVs. This is accomplished through surveillance programs, accelerated irradiation experiments (PIA), and followed by the statistical modeling of the surveillance and PIA database by non-linear and least-square regression analysis, such as the EONY model, which are valid for only available data set.To extend these current approaches beyond the scope of the surveillance test program is a challenge because of the scarcity of the future data. Currently, there is not enough experimentally generated data to assess with a high degree of certainty that current embrittlement trend curves, developed from the nuclear power plants, can be extrapolated to beyond 40 years. The reasons for this are:There is a clear need to establish, whether or not the additional damage mechanisms which were not been observed so far, appear at higher influences. There are now indications of late segregations of Ni, Mn and Si (so called late blooming phases) near the end of 40 years in service.Most of the databank on RPVs embrittlement has been obtained from the specimens irradiated in test or experimental reactors, as opposed to irradiations performed as part of power reactor surveillance programs. Many of the test reactor specimens have been exposed to fluences far higher than anticipated, even at or beyond 80 years of operation. However, because of the accelerated exposure achieved in test reactors versus power reactors, the concerns persist that the different damage mechanisms may be active in these different reactor environments. If it is true, this definitely would make test reactor data an unreliable predictor for the power reactor embrittlement.There are inconsistencies with the master curve approach, where the measured and predicted behaviors sometimes do not agree. This is typically in situations where one or more of the basic assumptions (usually either the fracture mode or homogeneity) are...