2019
DOI: 10.1186/s41984-019-0036-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telovelar approach versus transvermian approach in management of fourth ventricular tumors

Abstract: Background: The relationships of the fourth ventricle to the cerebellar surfaces and the fissures through which the fourth ventricle is approached surgically are among the most complex in the brain. The area in and around the fourth ventricle may be affected by a variety of neoplasms. Some are unique to the fourth ventricle; others are also found in different locations. The two most common surgical approaches to the fourth ventricle are the transvermian and the telovelar approaches. The aim of this study: The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decades, further authors have proposed technically advantaged approaches to the ventricular system. Regarding the fourth ventricle, approaches as the transvermian [ 9 ], a subtonsillar-transcerebellomedullary [ 10 ], a superior transvelar approach [ 11 ] or also endoscopic approaches [ 12 , 13 ] were described with claiming to be the superior one. The transvermian approach has been performed frequently in history, but data showed high rates of cerebellar mutism and disequilibrium [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decades, further authors have proposed technically advantaged approaches to the ventricular system. Regarding the fourth ventricle, approaches as the transvermian [ 9 ], a subtonsillar-transcerebellomedullary [ 10 ], a superior transvelar approach [ 11 ] or also endoscopic approaches [ 12 , 13 ] were described with claiming to be the superior one. The transvermian approach has been performed frequently in history, but data showed high rates of cerebellar mutism and disequilibrium [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the telovelar approach is compared with the transvermian approach (33,34), it seems to be protective for postoperative CM and neurological morbidity, although statistical significance was only reported by Ferguson et al (33) in a mixed adult/child series. The work of Ebrahim et al (34) does not include adequate statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Many surgical series, focused exclusively on the telovelar approach, show the beneficial result of this approach in preventing or reducing CM ( 15 24 , 32 ). When the telovelar approach is compared with the transvermian approach ( 33 , 34 ), it seems to be protective for postoperative CM and neurological morbidity, although statistical significance was only reported by Ferguson et al. ( 33 ) in a mixed adult/child series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a study of 40 patients presenting with various fourth ventricular masses with a 1:1 distribution of telovelar vs. transvermian resection, 75% of telovelar cases and 60% of transvermian cases achieved GTR. In addition, postoperative complications were higher with the transvermian approach, most notably cerebellar mutism and bulbar palsy, each with an incidence of 15% in transvermian and no incidence in telovelar cases [ 6 ]. The telovelar approach is currently preferred over the transvermian approach, which has a higher risk of cerebellar mutism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%