2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telomere Disruption Results in Non-Random Formation of De Novo Dicentric Chromosomes Involving Acrocentric Human Chromosomes

Abstract: Genome rearrangement often produces chromosomes with two centromeres (dicentrics) that are inherently unstable because of bridge formation and breakage during cell division. However, mammalian dicentrics, and particularly those in humans, can be quite stable, usually because one centromere is functionally silenced. Molecular mechanisms of centromere inactivation are poorly understood since there are few systems to experimentally create dicentric human chromosomes. Here, we describe a human cell culture model t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
75
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(107 reference statements)
12
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This would be particularly relevant at centromeric-repeated sequences in mammalian cells which deletion can lead to centromere inactivation (Stimpson et al 2010). However, both Drosophila and mammalian centromeric heterochromatin seem permissive to resection.…”
Section: Limiting Resection In Heterochromatin: What Functional Consementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would be particularly relevant at centromeric-repeated sequences in mammalian cells which deletion can lead to centromere inactivation (Stimpson et al 2010). However, both Drosophila and mammalian centromeric heterochromatin seem permissive to resection.…”
Section: Limiting Resection In Heterochromatin: What Functional Consementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies of telomere fusion use artificially generated or in vitro models [Rudolph et al, 2001;Vukovic et al, 2007;Stimpson et al, 2010;Gascoigne and Cheeseman 2013;Maciejowski et al, 2015], and there is little direct evidence for this mechanism occurring in vivo. The evidence that telomere erosion/telomere fusion causes genome instability in cancer is generally indirect, such as shortened telomeres or the presence of anaphase bridges [Rudolph et al, 2001;Gordon et al, 2003;Letsolo et al, 2010;Jones et al, 2012].…”
Section: Telomere Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robertsonian translocations, which are the result of translocation between the short arms of the acrocentric chromosomes, are the most common dicentric chromosomes in constitutional karyotypes and also in induced telomere fusions [Stimpson et al, 2010]. These translocations occur distal to the NOR material on the acrocentric short arms [Stimpson et al, 2010].…”
Section: Reorganisation After Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On dicentric chromosomes that contain two regions of centromeric DNA, one centromere often is inactivated, suggesting that DNA sequence alone is insufficient for centromere function. An important epigenetic determinant of centromere identity is the centromeric histone, centromeric protein A (CENP-A)/centromeric histone 3 (CENH3), a histone H3 variant that is enriched within centromeric nucleosomes at endogenous centromeres (1)(2)(3) but is absent from inactive centromeres of dicentric chromosomes (4,5). CENP-A/CENH3 distinguishes the centromere from the rest of the genome by contributing to uniquely organized chromatin that exists as alternating domains of CENP-A/CENH3 and H3-containing nucleosomes (6,7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%