2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205063
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telomerase inhibition, oligonucleotides, and clinical trials

Abstract: Telomerase is expressed in most types of tumors but not in most somatic cells. This observation has led to two hypotheses; (i) telomerase activity is necessary for the proliferation of cancer cells; and (ii) telomerase inhibitors are a powerful strategy for cancer chemotherapy. Testing the latter hypothesis requires the development of potent and selective inhibitors of telomerase and their testing in clinical trials. Assaying the e cacy of telomerase inhibitors will not be simple because telomere erosion will … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 In the current study, intratumoral GRN163 treatment of myeloma and lymphoma xenografts with short telomeres reduced tumor volumes by 40% to 50% compared with controls and was as effective as doxorubicin monotherapy in xenograft models. Although a potential limitation of oligonucleotide therapies is bioavailability to tumor tissues, 46 our results demonstrated that daily intraperitoneal GRN163 treatment decreased telomerase levels in flank xenografts (by up to 92% of control tumors) and reduced myeloma tumor growth (Figure 8). In addition, sublethally irradiated NOD/SCID mice with tumor xenografts treated with systemic daily intraperitoneal GRN163 (up to 50 mg/kg per day) exhibited no significant adverse effects compared with PBS-treated mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 In the current study, intratumoral GRN163 treatment of myeloma and lymphoma xenografts with short telomeres reduced tumor volumes by 40% to 50% compared with controls and was as effective as doxorubicin monotherapy in xenograft models. Although a potential limitation of oligonucleotide therapies is bioavailability to tumor tissues, 46 our results demonstrated that daily intraperitoneal GRN163 treatment decreased telomerase levels in flank xenografts (by up to 92% of control tumors) and reduced myeloma tumor growth (Figure 8). In addition, sublethally irradiated NOD/SCID mice with tumor xenografts treated with systemic daily intraperitoneal GRN163 (up to 50 mg/kg per day) exhibited no significant adverse effects compared with PBS-treated mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…45 Telomerase is an ideal target for oligonucleotide therapy because the critical RNA template of the ribonucleoprotein essential for telomeric elongation is exposed and accessible to competitive binding by nucleic acids. 12,46 Previous testing of a reverse transcriptase telomerase inhibitor in murine xenograft models with rapidly proliferating or bulky tumors has been limited by the death of the host animal from malignant disease before the onset of growth inhibition. However, in those experiments, the telomerase inhibitor (BIBR1532) failed to induce apoptosis or cell death in vitro even after prolonged treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, tumours that overexpress TRF2-like Burkitt's lymphoma, might be more resistant to telomerase-inhibition therapy. This hypothesis has to be tested in cell culture models using the currently available specific telomerase inhibitors in cell lines that overexpress, for example, TRF2 or hPif1 (Damm et al, 2001;Corey, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific expression of telomerase in most cancers raises the potential application of targeting telomerase for cancer therapy. Various strategies of telomerase-based therapeutics have been explored in the past decade including: vaccines targeting hTERT peptides for immunotherapy [7,8], gene-therapy using hTERT-promoter driven expression of suicide genes [9,10], and inhibition of telomerase activity [11][12][13]. The benefits and disadvantages of these different approaches have been reviewed [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%