“…For histological examination, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, according to standard procedures as previously described [ 59 – 62 ]. CC3 Asp175 (Cell Signaling Technology 9661), CC10 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-9772), CD4 [ 15 , 60 , 63 ] (1:50, Clone D7D2Z, 25229, Cell Signaling Technology), CD8 [ 60 , 62 ] (1:200, Clone 94A, CNIO Monoclonal Antibodies Core Unit handmade), prosurfactant protein C (millipore AB3786), p21 (291 H/B5, CNIO Monoclonal antibodies facility homemade), γH2AX Ser 139 (Millipore 05-636), PPERK Thr202/Tyr204 (Cell Signaling Tehcnology 9101), Ki67 (Cell Signaling 12202), total ERK1/2 (Abcam ab54230, ERK-7D8), F4-80 (ABD Serotec MCA497), CD3 [ 64 ] (undiluted, Roche, 2GV6, ref.790–4341); CD45R/B220 [ 65 ] (1:150, BD biosciences, 557390, RA3-6B2); FOXP3 [ 62 , 66 ] (1:50, 221D, CNIO Monoclonal antibodies facility homemade), p53 (POE316A, CNIO Monoclonal antibodies facility homemade), antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry in tissue sections. The antibodies used to identify the different lymphocytes subpopulations were previously tested, validated, and used by us [ 15 , 60 , 62 ] after the proper testing and validation performed by the corresponding manufacturers [ 63 – 66 ].…”