2010
DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v30i2.1233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Telling It Like It Is: The Role of Race, Class, & Culture in the Perpetuation of Learning Disability as a Privileged Category for the White Middle Class”

Abstract: <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves /> <w:TrackFormatting /> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF /> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of CRT, for instance, it has been noted that the topics of dis/ability and special education are not sufficiently represented or simply omitted, despite many overlapping interests and concerns that hold the promise of potentially strong allegiances between researchers (Connor 2008b). Similarly, there remains a vital task of fully accounting for race and critiquing the deployment of whiteness within the field of DS (Bell 2006;Blanchett 2010;Leonardo and Broderick 2011). Given the ways that race has figured so prominently in special education status, we would argue that it is nothing short of irresponsible to leave race out of dis/ability related research in special education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of CRT, for instance, it has been noted that the topics of dis/ability and special education are not sufficiently represented or simply omitted, despite many overlapping interests and concerns that hold the promise of potentially strong allegiances between researchers (Connor 2008b). Similarly, there remains a vital task of fully accounting for race and critiquing the deployment of whiteness within the field of DS (Bell 2006;Blanchett 2010;Leonardo and Broderick 2011). Given the ways that race has figured so prominently in special education status, we would argue that it is nothing short of irresponsible to leave race out of dis/ability related research in special education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Furthermore, literature has discussed the overrepresentation and the underrepresentation of White and Black students with a learning disability in the education system. 39 Of concern is the fact that White students with learning disabilities are more likely to be educated in regular classrooms, while Black students with behavioral and emotional difficulties are most likely to receive education in separate environments. 39 Indeed, the results of the present study reveal a racial discrepancy between White and ethnic minority groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Of concern is the fact that White students with learning disabilities are more likely to be educated in regular classrooms, while Black students with behavioral and emotional difficulties are most likely to receive education in separate environments. 39 Indeed, the results of the present study reveal a racial discrepancy between White and ethnic minority groups. White race was in a negative relationship as a predictor of the prevalence of households with people with disability living below poverty (regression coefficients were negative in both GWR models for males and females, see Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Conrad and Potter () suggested how the establishment of the label “ADHD” was promoted by professionally successful groups who nevertheless experienced they were “not good enough” and therefore needed an explanation for their “underperformance”; hence this label appeared attractive to some already endowed groups (see also Conrad & Potter’s, study on human growth hormones). Others have shown how, for instance, “learning disabilities” have been promoted by middle‐class families in order to justify their children’s mediocre results in school that could otherwise risk their future careers and social status; such a disability label “counterbalances the stigma associated with academic failure” (Hale, , p. 1; see also Blanchett, ; Sleeter, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%