1999
DOI: 10.1109/25.740076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teletraffic performance evaluation of microcellular personal communication networks (PCN's) with prioritized handoff procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Rigid division-based scheme [20]. All channels allocated to a cell are divided into two groups: one for the common use for all calls and the other solely for handoff calls.…”
Section: Second Classification Of Cac Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Rigid division-based scheme [20]. All channels allocated to a cell are divided into two groups: one for the common use for all calls and the other solely for handoff calls.…”
Section: Second Classification Of Cac Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the load threshold is further decreased by a guard factor for new calls. This strategy was suggested by (Cheng & Zhuang, 2002;Kulavaratharasah & Aghvami, 1999). In contrast, with the EP policy, both handoff and new calls are accepted if enough capacity exists to accomodate thier needs, no portion of the capacity is restricted for access of either type of call.…”
Section: Admission Control Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Him & Koo, 2005), the call attempts of new and handoff voice/data calls are blocked if there is no channel available, and a soft handoff blocking probability is derived as well. In what concerns the admission policies of handoff calls with respect to new calls, some schemes, such as the ones proposed in (Cheng & Zhuang, 2002;Kulavaratharasah & Aghvami, 1999), deploy a guard channel to reserve a fixed percentage of the BS's capacity for handoff users. Other schemes, called nonprioritized schemes in (Chang & Chen, 2006;Das et al, 2000), handle handoff calls exactly the same way they do with the new calls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme was first proposed by Ramjee et al [19] and shown to be more general than the cutoff priority scheme. c) Divide all channels allocated to a cell into two groups: one for the common use for all calls and the other for handoff calls only (the rigid division-based CAC scheme [13]). d) Limit the number of new calls admitted to the network (called the new call bounding scheme in this paper).…”
Section: ) Guard Channel (Gc) Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wireless networks, another dimension is added: call connection (or simply call) dropping is possible due to the users' mobility. A good CAC scheme has to balance the call blocking and call dropping in order to provide the desired QoS requirements [1], [4], [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%