Teletoxicology: Patient Assessment Using Wearable Audiovisual Streaming Technology

Abstract

Background Audiovisual streaming technologies allow detailed remote patient assessment and have been suggested to change management and enhance triage. The advent of wearable, head-mounted devices (HMDs) permits advanced teletoxicology at a relatively low cost. A previously published pilot study supports the feasibility of using the HMD Google Glass® (Google Inc.; Mountain View, CA) for teletoxicology consultation. This study examines the reliability, accuracy, and precision of the poisoned patient assessment when performed remotely via Google Glass®. Methods A prospective observational cohort study was performed on 50 patients admitted to a tertiary care center inpatient toxicology service. Toxicology fellows wore Google Glass® and transmitted secure, real-time video and audio of the initial physical examination to a remote investigator not involved in the subject's care. High-resolution still photos of electrocardiograms (ECGs) were transmitted to the remote investigator. On-site and remote investigators recorded physical examination findings and ECG interpretation. Both investigators completed a brief survey about the acceptability and reliability of the streaming technology for each encounter. Kappa scores and simple agreement were calculated for each examination finding and electrocardiogram parameter. Reliability scores and reliability difference were calculated and compared for each encounter. Results Data were available for analysis of 17 categories of examination and ECG findings. Simple agreement between on-site and remote investigators ranged from 68 to 100 % (median = 94 %, IQR = 10.5). Kappa scores could be calculated for 11/17 parameters and demonstrated slight to fair agreement for two parameters and moderate to almost perfect agreement for nine parameters (median = 0.653; substantial agreement). The lowest Kappa scores were for pupil size and response to light. On a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), mean comfort level was 93 and mean reliability rating was 89 for on-site investigators. For remote users, the mean comfort and reliability ratings were 99 and 86, respectively. The average difference in reliability scores between on-site and remote investigators was 2.6, with the difference increasing as reliability scores decreased. Conclusion Remote evaluation of poisoned patients via Google Glass® is possible with a high degree of agreement on examination findings and ECG interpretation. Evaluation of pupil size and response to light is limited, likely by the quality of streaming video. Users of Google Glass® for teletoxicology reported high levels of comfort with the technology and found it reliable, though as reported reliability decreased, remote users were most affected. Further study should compare patient-centered outcomes when using Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article

Explorations of wearable technology for tracking self and others

“…Other types of wearables include devices that can track the weather or users' environment and wearables for schedule management. Scheduling wearables have functions such as notifying users when it is time to take medications, sending messages and calls, recording images or videos, and connecting to social networking media to transfer their tracked data such as information about health or location (Czaja 2016;Skolnik et al 2016). Such wearables can use GPS or RFID to automatically transfer data about users' locations to social networking media to indicate where the users are with families or friends (Su et al 2016).…”

Music as an Adjunct to Opioid-Based Analgesia

“…Medical toxicologists have a growing experience using innovative mobile technologies in substance abuse investigations [42][43][44][45][46]. Understanding the ability of music to modulate pain may provide alternatives to opioids.…”

Usability and Reliability of Smart Glasses for Secondary Triage During Mass Casualty Incidents

“…[8,9,10] Although successful in remote hospitals, telemedicine support systems for EMS have specific challenges such as durability and portability of hardware, reliability of software packages, and the ability of users to rapidly gain proficiency in technology. AR has begun to find its role in medicine in the hospital, but has not been expanded into the setting of Disaster Medicine.…”