2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10502876.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telescopic Observations of Lunar Hydration: Variations and Abundance

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This removes gravity-driven dry debris flows as a possible origin for the lobate features observed in Unit D. Following the logic established in previous works (e.g., Howard and Wilshire 1975;Hawke and Head 1977), the Unit D deposits would require the incorporation of liquid material to form the observed flow-like features. While some trace amounts of molecular water or water ice have been identified in the lunar regolith (Liu et al 2012;Honniball et al 2020) and in the permanently shadowed regions of the lunar poles (Li et al 2018), there is far less water present than would be necessary to cause such fluvial mobility of the identified deposits. This leaves only the inclusion of either volcanic melt or impact-generated melt.…”
Section: Units C and D-melt-bearing Ejecta Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This removes gravity-driven dry debris flows as a possible origin for the lobate features observed in Unit D. Following the logic established in previous works (e.g., Howard and Wilshire 1975;Hawke and Head 1977), the Unit D deposits would require the incorporation of liquid material to form the observed flow-like features. While some trace amounts of molecular water or water ice have been identified in the lunar regolith (Liu et al 2012;Honniball et al 2020) and in the permanently shadowed regions of the lunar poles (Li et al 2018), there is far less water present than would be necessary to cause such fluvial mobility of the identified deposits. This leaves only the inclusion of either volcanic melt or impact-generated melt.…”
Section: Units C and D-melt-bearing Ejecta Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H 2 O exhibits a broad, shallow feature centered around 3.1 μm, while metal-OH, including in hydrated minerals that formed via aqueous alteration, exhibit a sharper, asymmetric feature centered around 2.7 μm (e.g., Clark 1999). The 3 μm region has been studied extensively on the Moon, which shows an absorption feature near 2.85 μm that has been linked to solar wind implantation or surficial H 2 O (Clark 2009;Pieters et al 2009;Sunshine et al 2009;McCord et al 2011;Wöhler et al 2017;Honniball et al 2020;Chauhan et al 2021;Laferriere et al 2022;Wilk et al 2024). The 3 μm band has also been extensively studied on the volatile-rich, carbonaceous C-type asteroids, some of which exhibit absorption at 2.7 μm or 3.1 μm with band depths as high as tens of percent (e.g., Campins et al 2010;Rivkin & Emery 2010;Takir & Emery 2012;Kitazato et al 2019;Rivkin et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%