2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telerehabilitation for people with aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The various areas in which this technology has found useful application include reduction of anxiety; 16 treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and paranoid delusions; 17,18 reduction of discomfort in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy; 19,20 reduction of acute pain during wound treatment and physical therapy in patients with burn injuries; 21 functional ability training and motor rehabilitation in patients with central nervous system dysfunctions (including stroke patients); 22 and rehabilitation of cognitive and linguistic functions. [23][24][25] The authors of the above-cited studies emphasize the lack of VR-based technological solutions that, in addition to the physical rehabilitation of stroke patients, would offer therapeutic tools that could alleviate mental disorders and improve the mood and motivation of patients. 26 Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of added immersive VR intervention to conventional rehabilitation on functional activity and mental state of stroke survivors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various areas in which this technology has found useful application include reduction of anxiety; 16 treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and paranoid delusions; 17,18 reduction of discomfort in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy; 19,20 reduction of acute pain during wound treatment and physical therapy in patients with burn injuries; 21 functional ability training and motor rehabilitation in patients with central nervous system dysfunctions (including stroke patients); 22 and rehabilitation of cognitive and linguistic functions. [23][24][25] The authors of the above-cited studies emphasize the lack of VR-based technological solutions that, in addition to the physical rehabilitation of stroke patients, would offer therapeutic tools that could alleviate mental disorders and improve the mood and motivation of patients. 26 Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of added immersive VR intervention to conventional rehabilitation on functional activity and mental state of stroke survivors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that current evidence suggests the feasibility of TR and its wellacceptability by both therapists and patients [9,29]. Indeed, in literature, many experiences of TR for motor [30], cognitive [31], and speech-language rehabilitation [32] have been published. In the great majority of these studies, we can face the so-called "closed" systems, which are useful for research (i.e., enrolment of selected patients according to research protocol), but they seem to be unavailable for community health services, especially in the pandemic reality, where the research protocols cannot be applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from VR, telerehabilitation, and computer-/tablet-based treatment studies are overwhelmingly positive, but lack of comparison studies and/or adequate control groups/tasks makes it difficult to identify superior protocols or attribute outcomes to the technological component of the treatment [104,105]. Some studies have shown similar response to remote delivery as in-person, supporting the notion that teletherapy is a viable and effective option [106][107][108]. There are also limited data showing better outcomes with computerized selfpractice than some traditional approaches/tasks [109,110], but any conclusions that one approach is collectively better than the other are inappropriate or, at least, premature.…”
Section: Language Speech and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%