2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41393-022-00797-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telerehabilitation for individuals with spinal cord injury in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature

Abstract: Study design Systematic review. Objective To systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness of telerehabilitation as an intervention for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Setting Not applicable. Methods MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Pubmed and Global Health databases were used to identify studies published between 1946… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, telerehabilitation encompasses diagnosing, evaluating, and managing health care for persons with physical, cognitive, or social impairment and disability [ 7 ]. Telerehabilitation has been shown to be both feasible and effective in chronic heart failure and coronary artery disease [ 8 ], stroke [ 9 ], multiple sclerosis [ 10 ], and spinal cord injuries [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, telerehabilitation encompasses diagnosing, evaluating, and managing health care for persons with physical, cognitive, or social impairment and disability [ 7 ]. Telerehabilitation has been shown to be both feasible and effective in chronic heart failure and coronary artery disease [ 8 ], stroke [ 9 ], multiple sclerosis [ 10 ], and spinal cord injuries [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the systematic review (2021), the effect of online transfer techniques and wheelchair mobility training on changing COPM scores was not studied [18]. In another systematic review conducted in 2022 in low-and middle-income countries, only 5 studies used the remote rehabilitation approaches in PwSCI [39]. None of them investigated the level of occupational performance and satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as experiencing barriers to rehabilitation, LMICs are experiencing an increase in life expectancy and greater numbers of people with noncommunicable diseases including neurological conditions [ 2 , 6 , 7 ]. Although in its early stages, telemedicine is increasingly being explored in LMICs to deliver care to challenging or remote areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of the clinical effectiveness of telerehabilitation for people with neurological conditions is mixed, but overall it is reported to be at least equivalent to standard care [ 12 , 13 ]. There is, however, limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation [ 6 , 9 ]. Much of the research in telerehabilitation has been undertaken in high-income countries, with notably fewer studies in LMICs [ 6 , 14 , 15 ], where the rehabilitation context, as well as the barriers and facilitators to the feasibility, adoption, scalability, and sustainability of telerehabilitation, may be quite different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%