2009
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telephone reliability of the Frenchay Activity Index and EQ-5D amongst older adults

Abstract: Background: Older adults may find it problematic to attend hospital appointments due to the difficulty associated with travelling to, within and from a hospital facility for the purpose of a faceto-face assessment. This study aims to investigate equivalence between telephone and face-to-face administration for the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) and the Euroqol-5D (EQ-5D) generic healthrelated quality of life instrument amongst an older adult population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Responses for proxy and patients at 6 months after stroke are similar. 18 In this study, we reported the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) as an overall measure of HRQoL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 Responses for proxy and patients at 6 months after stroke are similar. 18 In this study, we reported the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) as an overall measure of HRQoL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…10 HRQoL was assessed with the EuroQoL 5-dimensional questionnaire (ie, EQ-5D-3L) 16 which is applicable to most conditions, designed to be self-administered, and has good reliability for telephone administration. 17 Responses for proxy and patients at 6 months after stroke are similar. 18 In this study, we reported the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) as an overall measure of HRQoL.…”
Section: Patient Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Clinicians should therefore be aware of the test-retest error of an assessment tool not only due to the "clinician error" component but also due to the "patient performance" variation between sessions. Similarly, determining the most appropriate time duration between the test and retest assessments for investigations of this nature is impacted by two considerations [31]. First, a longer time between assessments may lead to a greater risk of a true change in scapular positioning occurring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 12-month telephone follow-up assessment was also completed by researches blinded to participant group allocation using a telephone version of the EQ-5D with VAS instrument, whilst also enquiring of sustained adherence to the allocated intervention [20]. Study approval was granted by local hospital and university ethics committees, and the trial was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12606000047594).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%