2012
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telephone referral education, and evidence of retention and transfer after six-months

Abstract: BackgroundEffective communication between clinicians is essential for safe, efficient healthcare. We undertook a study to determine the longer-term effectiveness of an education session employing a structured method to teach referral-making skills to medical students.MethodsAll final year medical students received a forty-five minute education intervention consisting: discussion of effective telephone referrals; video viewing and critique; explanation, demonstration and practice using ISBAR; provision of a mem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, students taking a retention test six weeks after receiving simulator training on the clinical management of chest pain and shortness of breath scored between 70% and 80% of the points they had achieved in a post-training directly after teaching [18]. Similarly, six-month retention rates of 64% have been reported for telephone referral skills [19]. In our study, proportional retention at two months ranged from 70% (any teaching followed by a summative assessment) to 83% (any teaching followed by a formative assessment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, students taking a retention test six weeks after receiving simulator training on the clinical management of chest pain and shortness of breath scored between 70% and 80% of the points they had achieved in a post-training directly after teaching [18]. Similarly, six-month retention rates of 64% have been reported for telephone referral skills [19]. In our study, proportional retention at two months ranged from 70% (any teaching followed by a summative assessment) to 83% (any teaching followed by a formative assessment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included the cognitive, affective and psychomotor aspects of learning, experiential, adult and collaborative learning theories and mastery learning (data not shown). Active learning, with the opportunity to practise, share personal experiences and reflect on performance was thought to contribute to the success of a telephone referral intervention (Marshall et al, 2012).…”
Section: Underlying Educational Theories Models and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tool-specific evaluations provided some evidence that tools for structured communication can improve students' ability to give clear and comprehensive messages and/or to receive and understand information. The clarity and content of telephone referrals made by final year medical students significantly improved following training in the use of ISBAR (identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Request) compared with a control group and much of this improvement was still apparent six months later (Marshall et al, 2009;Marshall et al, 2012); and medical students attending surgical morbidity and mortality conferences demonstrated significantly improved understanding of patient safety issues when presenters were required to use an adapted SBAR format to structure their presentations (Mitchell et al, 2013). Whole intervention evaluations reported similar benefits: medical students' communication skills were significantly improved following a surgical simulation curriculum based on the 'TeamSTEPPS® Essentials' course, which included the use of SBAR and the 'two-challenge' rule (Meier et al, 2012); and the use of ISOBAR in an interprofessional training ward facilitated communication at handover (Brewer & Stewart-Wynne, 2013).…”
Section: Content and Clarity Of Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seminar included: exploration of experiences to date (positive and negative); discussion of what constitutes a good referral; structural tools for referral (e.g. the ISBAR tool); two fictitious scenarios to illustrate preparation, information gathering, logical structure, clear aims and focusing on pertinent aspects; and two role‐play scenarios.…”
Section: What Problems Were Addressed?mentioning
confidence: 99%