Telephone Coaching to Enhance a Home‐Based Physical Activity Program for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bennell, Kim L; Campbell, Penny K; Egerton, Thorlene; Metcalf, Ben; Kasza, Jessica; Forbes, Andrew Benjamin; Bills, Caroline; Gale, Janette; Harris, Anthony; Kolt, Gregory S.; Bunker, Stephen; Hunter, David J.; Brand, Caroline; Hinman, Rana S

doi:10.1002/acr.22915

Cited by 105 publications

(130 citation statements)

References 45 publications

(49 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

125

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This can be done by PA assessments and any other assessments related to the individual aims. As PA assessments, performance–based tests, patient-reported outcome measures (eg, SQUASH,104 PASE94) and self-monitoring tools (eg, wearables such as Fitbit,100 pedometer99 or accelerometer101) were identified. However, we did not evaluate the validity and reliability of the assessments applied.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regular physical activity (PA) is increasingly promoted for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases as well as the general population. We evaluated if the public health recommendations for PA are applicable for people with inflammatory arthritis (iA; Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis) and osteoarthritis (hip/knee OA) in order to develop evidence-based recommendations for advice and guidance on PA in clinical practice. The EULAR standardised operating procedures for the development of recommendations were followed. A task force (TF) (including rheumatologists, other medical specialists and physicians, health professionals, patient-representatives, methodologists) from 16 countries met twice. In the first TF meeting, 13 research questions to support a systematic literature review (SLR) were identified and defined. In the second meeting, the SLR evidence was presented and discussed before the recommendations, research agenda and education agenda were formulated. The TF developed and agreed on four overarching principles and 10 recommendations for PA in people with iA and OA. The mean level of agreement between the TF members ranged between 9.8 and 8.8. Given the evidence for its effectiveness, feasibility and safety, PA is advocated as integral part of standard care throughout the course of these diseases. Finally, the TF agreed on related research and education agendas. Evidence and expert opinion inform these recommendations to provide guidance in the development, conduct and evaluation of PA-interventions and promotion in people with iA and OA. It is advised that these recommendations should be implemented considering individual needs and national health systems.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While resistance training load is usually quantified using a percentage of one repetition maximum (1RM), the use of RPE has been shown to be a valid indicator of elastic resistance training intensity in older adults (17). The weekly telephone support provided to the UNSUP group may also have encouraged exercise adherence (8). Therefore, it is unknown whether the same results would have occurred if there was no contact with participants during the intervention period.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Short-Term Training and Detraining Effects of Supervised vs. Unsupervised Resistance Exercise in Aging Adults

Orange

Marshall

Madden

et al. 2019

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study compared the effects of a 4-week supervised (SUP) and unsupervised (UNSUP) resistance training programme followed by 12 weeks of detraining (DET). Thirty-six healthy aging adults (age: 53.6 ± 3.6 years; body mass index: 28.3 ± 5.1 kg/m) were randomly allocated to a SUP group (n = 17) or an UNSUP group (n = 19). Participants completed three training sessions per week using resistance bands and body weight movements. Measures of physical performance were administered at baseline, at the end of the training programme, and after the DET period. Function was assessed with the six minute walk test (6MWT), timed up-and-go (TUG), 30 s chair sit-to-stand (STS), stair-climb test (SCT), 40 m fast-paced walk test (FPWT) and sit-and-reach test (SRT), whereas the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) and hand grip test were used to measure muscle strength. Following training, improvements in performance were found in the 6MWT, TUG, 30 s chair STS, SCT, FPWT, SRT, and IMTP (p < 0.05), with no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). In addition, the majority of training-induced improvements remained significantly above baseline values after the DET period (p < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed following training or DET (p > 0.05). Four weeks of either SUP or UNSUP resistance training is sufficient to substantially improve muscle strength and function in aging adults, and these gains are largely preserved following prescribed exercise cessation. Home-based resistance training appears to be a practical and effective alternative to traditional SUP programmes that may help circumvent many barriers to physical activity in aging adults.

show abstract

“…Japanese people with KL grade ≥ 2 were included in this study. The data for people from Australia were the baseline data from a randomized controlled trial that evaluated the effectiveness of adding telephone coaching to a physiotherapist-delivered physical activity intervention [22]. Participants in the Australian trial were diagnosed with knee OA using American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria [23].…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Participants from Japan completed questionnaires in an outpatient setting. Participants from Australia completed questionnaires at home via post/email [22].…”

Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Differences in Psychological Characteristics Between People With Knee Osteoarthritis From Japan and Australia

Uritani

Campbell

Metcalf

et al. 2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate differences in psychological characteristics between people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) from Japan and Australia.Methods A total of 62 adults from Japan and 168 adults from Australia aged over 50 years with knee pain were included. Japanese data were collected from patients with knee OA diagnosed by medical doctors. Australian data were baseline data from a randomized controlled trial. Psychological characteristics evaluated were depressive symptoms (depression subscale of the 21-item short-form of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale), fear of movement (Brief Fear of Movement Scale for Osteoarthritis), and pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale). Psychological characteristics were compared between the Japanese and Australian cohorts by calculating 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for difference of the mean. To test for equivalence of the average values of characteristics, the equivalence margin was set at 0.5 standard deviations (SD) of the mean, where these SDs were based on the Australian data. When the 95%CI for the difference of the mean value lay entirely within the range of equivalence margin (i.e. between -0.5 and 0.5 times the Australian SD), the outcome was considered equivalent.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the groups from Japan and Australia for depressive symptoms (mean ± SD; Japan 4.9±5.4, Australia 4.2±4.7) and fear of movement (11.7±3.8, 12.5±3.2, respectively). Mean (95%CI) between group differences were 0.75 (-0.79 to 2.28) for depressive symptoms and -0.77 (-1.77 to 0.22) for fear of movement. Based on the equivalence test, 95%CIs of mean difference between groups for depressive symptoms was within the range of equivalence margin (±2.35). However, the lower limit of the 95% CI of difference in mean for fear of movement (-1.77) was just outside the lower equivalence margin (-1.60). People from Japan with knee OA showed significantly higher pain catastrophizing (20.7±11.0) than those from Australia (14.8±9.6).ConclusionsPeople from Japan with knee OA showed higher pain catastrophizing than people from Australia. The level of depressive symptoms and fear of movement appeared to be equivalent between people from the two countries.

show abstract

Telephone Coaching to Enhance a Home‐Based Physical Activity Program for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Cited by 105 publications

References 45 publications

2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis

2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis

Short-Term Training and Detraining Effects of Supervised vs. Unsupervised Resistance Exercise in Aging Adults

Differences in Psychological Characteristics Between People With Knee Osteoarthritis From Japan and Australia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About