1967
DOI: 10.1037/h0024760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telepathy and emotional stimuli: A controlled experiment.

Abstract: This controlled laboratory study indicates that something like telepathy occurs between 2 people, isolated from each other, when the Transmitter (T) is emotionally aroused and the Receiver (R) is lying down, relaxed. At least, results show that 7 out of 12 professional psychologists and psychiatrists matched the protocols of 30 experimental T-R teams significantly better than chance expectation (p < .05); whereas under 2 control conditions involving 13 and 10 T-R teams, respectively, only 1 of the same 12 judg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the findings mentioned in the two previous paragraphs seem highly compatible with those reported by Moss and Gengerelli (1967), an experiment unfortunately seen only after the present data were gathered. In the 1967 study evidence of QSC was obtained when the sender was aroused by emotional stimuli, but the receiver was relaxed.…”
Section: Accuracy and Arousalsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the findings mentioned in the two previous paragraphs seem highly compatible with those reported by Moss and Gengerelli (1967), an experiment unfortunately seen only after the present data were gathered. In the 1967 study evidence of QSC was obtained when the sender was aroused by emotional stimuli, but the receiver was relaxed.…”
Section: Accuracy and Arousalsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The authors believe that the growing number of observations of QSC made in the laboratory under controlled conditions (e.g., Duane & Behrendt, 1965;Krippner, 1968;Moss & Gengerelli, 1967) is leading to an increased readiness to reexamine alleged phenomena which heretofore have been summarily dismissed. For instance, Lyons (1965, p. 215) has speculated as to the possible relation between ESP and the worrisome "experimenter bias" documented by Rosenthal (1966).…”
Section: Accuracy and Arousalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychologists have begun to feel it appropriate to study ESP, after several decades of treating this topic as taboo. Almost all of this recent effort has gone into exploring the nature and extent of such ESP effects as might really exist (Child, 1973;Lay ton & Turnbull, 1975;McBain, Fox, Kimura, Nakanishi, & Tirado, 1970;Moss, Chang, & Levitt, 1970;Moss & Gengerelli, 1967). From a social psychological standpoint, however, what may be even more interesting is the question of how people come to believe in ESP, in general, and in their own experience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, psychology has the problem that certain scientific investigations have tried to statistically contrast the occurrence of some apparently impossible experiences and obtained significant results. This is the case for pre-cognition (e.g., Tressoldi et al, 2009;Bem, 2011;Mossbridge et al, 2012;McCraty and Atkinson, 2014;Bem et al, 2016;Mossbridge and Radin, 2018), telepathy (e.g., Moss and Gengerelli, 1967;Krippner and Ullman, 1970;Honorton, 1985;Sheldrake and Avraamides, 2009), the anomalous reception of information or mediumship (e.g., Beischel and Schwartz, 2007;Kelly and Arcangel, 2011;Sudduth, 2013;Beischel et al, 2015), and the mind-matter interaction (e.g., Radin, 2006;Tressoldi et al, 2014). Studies of core "psi" phenomena experiences (see Cardeña, 2018;Jinks, 2019), such as these facilitate discussion regarding the possibility of the existence of alternative phenomena that transgress the bases of human perception (e.g., Utts, 2018;Cardeña, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%