1994
DOI: 10.1109/21.293496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teleoperated system performance evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A cooperative peg-in-hole task has been employed to evaluate the effectiveness of haptic guides in bilateral teleoperation grasping [7]. Another peg-in-hole type task was performed by McLean et al [8] to evaluate new performance metrics and to study effects of 2D, 3D, and direct viewing conditions. Goel et al [9] and Hwang and Hannaford [10] have employed point-to-point motion and positioning tasks to evaluate redundancy resolution schemes considering joint failure and pseudoinverse inertia weighting, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cooperative peg-in-hole task has been employed to evaluate the effectiveness of haptic guides in bilateral teleoperation grasping [7]. Another peg-in-hole type task was performed by McLean et al [8] to evaluate new performance metrics and to study effects of 2D, 3D, and direct viewing conditions. Goel et al [9] and Hwang and Hannaford [10] have employed point-to-point motion and positioning tasks to evaluate redundancy resolution schemes considering joint failure and pseudoinverse inertia weighting, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teleoperation systems have been the object of study since 1949 (Goertz, 1964) but studies have mainly concentrated on the analysis of the factors of the system, such as bilateral control, master devices, operator aids, effects of time delay, force feedback, movement control, etc (Lee & Lee, 1993;Lida & Ohnishi, 2004;McLean, Prescott, & Podhorodeski, 1994;Sheridan, 1992). These factors affect system performance and thus the quality of the task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods to evaluate teleoperation systems are classified into mainly two ways: theory-based [4] [20] and experiment-based [6][2][13] [14]. The theory-based approach enables us to evaluate the systems quantitatively, but we first need to identify the dynamics of the target system.…”
Section: Tmmentioning
confidence: 99%