“…Due to the constrained and highly choreographed nature of many HRI studies, deep insights into people's responses and interactions with robots in natural settings remain relatively rare. Of the field studies that have conducted HRI research in these spaces, important insights are emerging from both single interaction [e.g., 25,26] and repeated interaction [e.g., [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] studies, with much of this work taking place in public spaces or tied to specific settings like education [e.g., 31,[34][35][36][37][38], care [e.g., 32,33,[39][40][41][42], or rehabilitation [e.g., 27,30,[43][44][45][46]. Longitudinal studies that address similar questions with disembodied agents such as virtual assistants and chatbots [e.g., [47][48][49] benefit from access to users' personal devices, whereas research with physically embodied artificial agents (i.e., social robots) remains far rarer due to challenges with logistical and cost barriers to situating these devices in users' domestic settings (i.e., in their home environment) to explore single or repeated interactions.…”