2020
DOI: 10.1080/13602004.2020.1741168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teleology Behind the Prohibition of Recognition of Polygamous Marriages Under the EU Family Reunification Directive: A Critique of Rule Effectiveness

Abstract: She is a specialist in Private International Law and Migration Law. She combines legal analysis with critical social theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This application of the Directive does not verify whether the rights of the additional spouse were more effectively respected by rejection or approval of the application, for instance through providing the spouse with a procedural option to rebut the presumption of involuntary marriage. The rule thus most often harmfully impacts the women who are additional spouses (Stybnarova, 2020; Naqvi, 2017).…”
Section: Case Study 1: Equality Of the Sexes And The Protection Of Women As An Aim Of Current Migration Law-making In Eu And Denmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This application of the Directive does not verify whether the rights of the additional spouse were more effectively respected by rejection or approval of the application, for instance through providing the spouse with a procedural option to rebut the presumption of involuntary marriage. The rule thus most often harmfully impacts the women who are additional spouses (Stybnarova, 2020; Naqvi, 2017).…”
Section: Case Study 1: Equality Of the Sexes And The Protection Of Women As An Aim Of Current Migration Law-making In Eu And Denmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limiting options for family reunification with the given measures in effect curtails the immigration of certain classes of migrants, particularly Muslims (Shah, 2003), but above all the women whose equality was of concern to the legislators (Case Study 1). Moreover, the measures adopted do not result in meaningful consent (Stybnarova, 2020; Naqvi, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there has been no research in the last 5 years on legal issues arising from notai deed, the truth of the contents of which is not the focus of the Apsotille Convention, so that the legal force of the said deed is very weak in the process of resolving disputes in transnational activities. Therefore, this research is a continuation of previous research that specifically discusses the responsibility of the notary profession for apostille documents [7]. Another study was conducted by Margaret E. Swain and Colin James Rogerson, regarding the authentication of public documents of cross-border surrogate mothers in 2020 [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%