Telemedicine visits generate accurate surgical plans across orthopaedic subspecialties

Abstract

Introduction The role of telemedicine is rapidly evolving across medical specialties and orthopaedics. The utility of telemedicine to identify operative candidates and determine surgical plans has yet to be demonstrated. We sought to assess whether surgical plans proposed following telemedicine visits changed after subsequent in-person interaction across orthopaedic subspecialties. Materials and methods We identified all elective telemedicine encounters across two academic institutions from March 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020. We identified patients indicated for surgery with a specific surgical plan during the virtual visit. The surgical plans delineated during the telemedicine encounter were then compared to final pre-operative plans documented following subsequent in-person evaluation. Changes in the surgical plan between telemedicine and in-person encounters were defined using a standardised schema. Regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with a change in surgical plan between visits across specialties, including the number of virtual examination manoeuvres performed. Results We identified 303 instances of a patient being indicated for orthopaedic surgery during a telemedicine encounter. In 11 cases (4%), the plan was changed between telemedicine and subsequent in-person encounter. No plans were changed amongst patients indicated for joint arthroplasty and foot and ankle surgery, whilst 4% of plans were changed amongst sports surgery and upper extremity/shoulder surgery. Surgical plans had the highest rate of change amongst spine surgery patients (8%). There was notable variability in the conduct of virtual examinations across subspecialties. Conclusion Our results demonstrate the capability of telemedicine to support development of accurate surgical plans for orthopaedic patients across several subspecialties. Our findings also highlight the substantial variation in the utilisation of physical examination manoeuvres conducted via telemedicine across institutions, subspecialties, and providers. Description of study type Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

ALIF Versus TLIF for L5-S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: ALIF Demonstrates Superior Segmental and Regional Radiographic Outcomes and Clinical Improvements Across More Patient-reported Outcome Measures Domains

“…This combination of data abstraction followed the methodology of previous studies. [18][19][20] Two tertiary medical centers, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, and their affiliate hospitals, Newton-Wellesley Hospital and Faulkner Hospital, respectively, are included in the clinical registry.…”

The Telemedicine-Based Pediatric Examination of the Back and Lower Limbs: A Narrative Review

“…This highlights telemedicine's potential in the development of accurate surgical plans for orthopedic patients. 66…”

Digital medical history implementation to triage orthopaedic patients during COVID‐19: Findings from a rapid cycle, semi‐randomised A/B testing quality improvement project

“…For example, telemedicine has become a routine component of orthopaedic care delivery, and patients and surgeons tend to be satisfied with telehealth encounters (Rizzi et al., 2020 ). Further, treatment plans devised via telemedicine have been shown to rarely change following in‐person preoperative or pre‐preprocedural encounters, suggesting that such technological integration helps make care delivery more efficient for all parties (Crawford et al., 2021a , 2012b ; Lightsey et al., 2021 ). In addition to the exponential growth of telehealth encounters, other areas of advancement that show promise or have been emphasised during this crisis are the collection of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs), and, in the present study, the collection of a DMH.…”