Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey

Abstract

Background In an effort to contain the effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, health care systems worldwide implemented telemedical solutions to overcome staffing, technical, and infrastructural limitations. In Germany, a multitude of telemedical systems are already being used, while new approaches are rapidly being developed in response to the crisis. However, the extent of the current implementation within different health care settings, the user’s acceptance and perception, as well as the hindering technical and regulatory obstacles remain unclear. Objective The aim of this paper is to assess the current status quo of the availability and routine use of telemedical solutions, user acceptance, and the subjectively perceived burdens on telemedical approaches. Furthermore, we seek to assess the perception of public information quality among professional groups and their preferred communication channels. Methods A national online survey was conducted on 14 consecutive days in March and April 2020, and distributed to doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in the German language. Results A total of 2827 medical professionals participated in the study. Doctors accounted for 65.6% (n=1855) of the professionals, 29.5% (n=833) were nursing staff, and 4.9% (n=139) were identified as others such as therapeutic staff. A majority of participants rated the significance of telemedicine within the crisis as high (1065/2730, 39%) or neutral (n=720, 26.4%); however, there were significant differences between doctors and nurses (P=.01) as well as between the stationary sector compared to the ambulatory sector (P<.001). Telemedicine was already in routine use for 19.6% (532/2711) of German health care providers and in partial use for 40.2% (n=1090). Participants working in private practices (239/594, 40.2%) or private clinics (23/59, 39.0%) experienced less regulatory or technical obstacles compared to university hospitals (586/1190, 49.2%). A majority of doctors rated the public information quality on COVID-19 as good (942/1855, 50.8%) or very good (213/1855, 11.5%); nurses rated the quality of public information significantly lower (P<.001). Participant’s age negatively correlated with the perception of telemedicine’s significance (ρ=–0.23; P<.001). Conclusions Telemedicine has a broad acceptance among German medical professionals. However, to establish telemedical structures within routine care, technical and regulatory burdens must be overcome.

Use of telemedicine by practising allergists before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

“…Although the majority of respondents were positive about the integration of telemedicine into everyday clinical practice, overall, a rather heterogeneous picture emerged in the free-text responses, which reflects the cross-section and corresponds to the data of Peine et al. collected in different care settings across professions [ 7 ].…”

“…After the ban on exclusive remote treatment had already been relaxed in 2018 [ 2 ], the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) Physicians now published simplified instructions for the implementation of telemedical services [ 3 ] including lists of certified technology providers [ 4 ] and corresponding remuneration structures [ 5 ]. While a survey by Stiftung Gesundheit described a clear increase in the use of telemedicine applications in 2020 [ 6 ], a survey of different participants in the health care system showed that the necessity, processes and benefits in different care structures differ significantly in some cases [ 7 ]. Although the authors also show a high acceptance of telemedical services across all professions, their implementation in different care scenarios seems to be confronted with different hurdles.…”

Understanding New Zealand Adults’ Attitudes Towards Digital Interventions for Health

“…Moreover, healthcare has been transformed dramatically due to the COVID-19 pandemic (Hassounah, Raheel, & Alhefzi, 2020) as healthcare delivery needed to rapidly shift to minimal face-to-face contact in a situation of unprecedented demand on resources. Thus bringing e-health to the forefront of healthcare (Hassounah et al, 2020;Isautier et al, 2020;Peine et al, 2020). As such, e-health has become a major tool in the fight against COVID-19.…”

Telemedicine in allergology: practical aspects

“…Current surveys show a good acceptance of telemedical applications in different areas of healthcare and across different professions related to patient care [ 6 ]. It is however clear that the used technologies differ depending on the user group and clinical scenario [ 7 ].…”