Telehealth Policy, Practice, and Education: a Position Statement of the Society of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Telehealth services, specifically telemedicine audio-video and audio-only patient encounters, expanded dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic through temporary waivers and flexibilities tied to the public health emergency. Early studies demonstrate significant potential to advance the quintuple aim (patient experience, health outcomes, cost, clinician well-being, and equity). Supported well, telemedicine can particularly improve patient satisfaction, health outcomes, and equity. Implemented poorly, telemedicine can facilitate unsafe care, worsen disparities, and waste resources. Without further action from lawmakers and agencies, payment will end for many telemedicine services currently used by millions of Americans at the end of 2024. Policymakers, health systems, clinicians, and educators must decide how to support, implement, and sustain telemedicine, and long-term studies and clinical practice guidelines are emerging to provide direction. In this position statement, we use clinical vignettes to review relevant literature and highlight where key actions are needed. These include areas where telemedicine must be expanded (e.g., to support chronic disease management) and where guidelines are needed (e.g., to prevent inequitable offering of telemedicine services and prevent unsafe or low-value care). We provide policy, clinical practice, and education recommendations for telemedicine on behalf of the Society of General Internal Medicine. Policy recommendations include ending geographic and site restrictions, expanding the definition of telemedicine to include audio-only services, establishing appropriate telemedicine service codes, and expanding broadband access to all Americans. Clinical practice recommendations include ensuring appropriate telemedicine use (for limited acute care situations or in conjunction with in-person services to extend longitudinal care relationships), that the choice of modality be done through patient-clinician shared decision-making, and that health systems design telemedicine services through community partnerships to ensure equitable implementation. Education recommendations include developing telemedicine-specific educational strategies for trainees that align with accreditation body competencies and providing educators with protected time and faculty development resources. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08190-8.

The Influence of Telemedicine Adoption and Facility Accreditation on Patient Satisfaction and Outcomes: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Rural Colombia

“…Telemedicine has the potential to significantly reduce waiting times for medical care in rural areas. By enabling remote consultations and providing quick access to healthcare professionals, telemedicine can alleviate the prolonged waiting periods often associated with the limited availability of specialists in rural regions (Bilal et al, 2022;Brunet et al, 2022;Chen et al, 2023;Chin et al, 2022). Patients can receive prompt medical attention and timely interventions, resulting in improved health outcomes and increased satisfaction with their care.…”

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Hospitalizations Are Similar for Patients Receiving Televisit-Delivered Outpatient Care and Those Receiving Traditional In-Person Care

“…Telehealth refers to practicing medicine at a distance. Telehealth encompasses both modalities such as remote patient monitoring (e.g., blood pressure measurements) to collect health information between visits, patientfacing applications, and other mobile health technology and virtual clinic visits (6).…”