Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Abstract

Context: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused increased interest in the application of telehealth to provide care without exposing patients and physicians to the risk of contagion. The urological literature on the topic is sparse. Objective: To perform a systematic review of the literature and evaluate all the available studies on urological applications of telehealth. Evidence acquisition: After registration on PROSPERO, we searched PubMed and Scopus databases to collect any kind of studies evaluating any telehealth interventions in any urological conditions. The National Toxicology Program/Office of Health Assessment and Translation Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human and Animal Studies was used to estimate the risk of bias. A narrative synthesis was performed. Evidence synthesis: We identified 45 studies (11 concerning prostate cancer [PCa], three hematuria management, six urinary stones, 14 urinary incontinence [UI], five urinary tract infections [UTIs], and six other conditions), including 12 randomized controlled trials. The available literature indicates that telemedicine has been implemented successfully in several common clinical scenarios, including the decision-making process following a diagnosis of nonmetastatic PCa, follow-up care of patients with localized PCa after curative treatments, initial diagnosis of hematuria, management diagnosis and follow-up care of uncomplicated urinary stones and uncomplicated UTIs, and initial evaluation, behavioral therapies, and pelvic floor muscle training in UI patients, as well

How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted Polish urologists? Results from a national survey

“…The factors underlying this aversion could be the rapid, unprepared telemedicine introduction at an extremely broad scale, with a general indication of the avoidance of face-to-face visits and low to no selection of patients, who could safely be treated using this modality [ 9 ]. Generally, previous experiences with telemedicine in urology were very promising and truly beneficial in selected patients [ 10 , 11 ]. Possibly, a slower, more structured introduction with the pre-training of both, physicians and patients, as implemented in other countries, could change the perception of Polish urologists [ 12 ].…”

The Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among the Medical Oncology Staff of ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia: Efficacy of Preventive Measures

“…During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, oncology units should adopt all possible precautions to reduce the spread of the virus among patients and HCPs (4). The adoption of telemedicine, which was probably underused before the current emergency, helped us to avoid overcrowding in the Oncology Unit, without causing any reduction in the quality of care, in line with a recent review of the literature (6). Physical distancing of 1 m or more and the use of face masks have been shown, in a recent meta-analysis of data from heterogeneous healthcare and community settings (7), to significantly protect against the risk of transmission of betacoronaviruses.…”

Leveraging Digital Technology to Overcome Barriers in the Prosthetic and Orthotic Industry: Evaluation of its Applicability and Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…With patients using the internet to access health care increasing each year, the quality of any service provided by this means should be evidence-based and necessary [ 41 ]. Any assessment administered online needs to be followed by automated reports with scans or images, objective and subjective assessment [ 42 , 43 ], patient expectations, prescription, expected outcomes, and timelines. Virtual assessment can overcome many of the pitfalls of physical assessment while greatly expanding the potential pool of patients who may be unable or unwilling to attend a physical clinic.…”