Telehealth in outpatient care for children and adolescents with chronic conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review protocol

Abstract

Introduction Outpatient care for children and adolescents with chronic conditions needs to be continuous and programmed, encompassing comprehensive care, with periodically scheduled consultations, exams, and procedures, to promote quality of life and reduce mortality. In the context of the new coronavirus pandemic, however, outpatient care for children and adolescents with chronic conditions, in person, was hampered in favor of social isolation, a necessary sanitary measure to reduce and prevent the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019. In response to this need, studies suggest telehealth in pediatrics as a fertile and expanding field especially in times of pandemics. Here, we aimed to map the evidence related to telehealth in outpatient care for children and adolescents with chronic conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic, to identify which strategies were implemented and their impacts on the continuity of care. Methods A scoping review protocol is reported and guided by the Scoping Reviews Manual of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The search for evidence will cover the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Libary; Embase; Web of Science; Scopus; Cinahl and PsycINFO, plus additional sources, such as The British Library, Google Scholar, and Preprints [medRXiv]. No date or language restrictions will be employed in this scoping review. Two independent researchers will conduct the search strategy, study selection, data charting, and data synthesis. Results The findings will be presented through tables, charts, narrative summaries, and assessed based on the type of data charted as well as outcomes. Additionally, the meaning of these findings will be considered as they relate to the guiding question, the characterization and measurement of the impact of different telehealth modalities used in outpatient care for children and adolescents with chronic conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the implications for practice and further research. Discussion To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to look specifically at the telehealth modalities to be used in outpatient care for children and adolescents with chronic conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. We expect that our results will be of interest to practitioners as well as researchers concerned with this particular emerging issue in the pandemic context. Also, the plans for the dissemination of this study comprise peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. trial registration Open Science Framework Registration: osf.io/5pqgu.

Quality of life of transgender people under the lens of social determinants of health: a scoping review protocol

“…Three reviewers (KHCC, JAM and LCL-J) will separately record the data for each included study using previously published forms 51–59. The expected completion date of this ScR is July 2023.…”

Health Policies for Rare Disease Patients: A Scoping Review

“…To locate the articles, descriptors related to the research topic were selected based on the PCC strategy. Then, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), Health Science Descriptors (DeCS), Emtree, CINAHL headings, and PsycINFO thesaurus were used to verify whether these words were controlled or uncontrolled descriptors were indexed in these bases, using the Boolean operators AND and OR [ 21 , 22 ]. The complete search strategy used in all databases and additional sources is presented in Table A2 .…”

“…Pre-established tools were used for data extraction [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], which included four domains: (a) study identification with article title, country of authors, year of publication, host institution, conflict of interests, and funding; (b) methodological characteristics, including study design, objective or research question or hypotheses, sample characteristics (sample size and age, baseline characteristics of experimental and control groups), recruitment method, losses, follow-up duration, and statistical analysis; (c) main findings and implications for clinical practice; and (d) conclusions [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The selected studies were then classified by evidence hierarchy [ 26 ].…”

Completeness and quality of information about death from COVID-19 in a Brazilian state: A descriptive population-based register study

“…It is known that the diagnostic tests for COVID-19 have stood out in the pandemic as an essential tool to track the spread of the disease, and RT-PCR is adopted as the gold standard, while serological tests play the role of aid in diagnosis. [6,[33][34][35][36][37] The expansion of access to laboratory tests favors the early recognition of cases, allowing proper isolation of contact and assistance for the prevention of complications, which also contributes to the reduction of reproductive indicators of the disease. It was evidenced that in countries where mass testing was performed, such as South Korea, the lethality rate was between 1% to 2%.…”