2000
DOI: 10.1159/000326357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telecytologic Diagnosis of Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy obtained by other telemedical studies on various lesions varied between 48 and 99% [1,2,4,5,7,8,10,29]. The accuracy of cytological and histological differentiation between HCC and N-HCC achieved in our study on the original slides and on digital images by the three pathologists was similar, ranging between 78.7 and 87.7%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The accuracy obtained by other telemedical studies on various lesions varied between 48 and 99% [1,2,4,5,7,8,10,29]. The accuracy of cytological and histological differentiation between HCC and N-HCC achieved in our study on the original slides and on digital images by the three pathologists was similar, ranging between 78.7 and 87.7%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…But it must be kept in mind that the diagnoses made by the three pathologists are mostly ‘hedged diagnoses' [5,31], i.e. they made their diagnoses with caution, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown with specimens of pleural effusions [27], FNAs of the breast [41] and gynecological smears [9] that interobserver variability was not significantly lower whether the participant pathologists made their diagnoses on digital images or the original glass slides of the same cases. One could assume that using virtual slides instead of still images might improve the diagnostic accuracy and interrater concordance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the remaining 16%, the images were deemed insufficient for a definitive diagnosis, with 1 case representing a false-negative result in an invasive lobular carcinoma. Briscoe et al [29] reported that observer experience was important in breast fine-needle aspiration static-image telecytology. In their study, the pathologist having the most experience had the highest level of concordance and ‘diagnostic confidence’.…”
Section: Telediagnosis/teleconsultationmentioning
confidence: 99%